-Original Message-
From: Thorsten Muller
Sent: 08 May 2008 09:32
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cc: Thorsten Muller
Subject: RE: Juniper Encapsulation question on MX960
Hi,
I have a question about the Ethernet encapsulation in L2 VPN's on a MX960
I want to connect a customer on a
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Pekka Savola wrote:
You can use the 'show chassis spmb/feb/ssb/...' to view DRAM memory
utilization on the switch board.
How can you find out what's taking DRAM memory? 'show route summary'
on 'vty ssb' (or similar) shows how much your routing table takes but
that's all
Hi Giuliano,
Is that M- or J- series?
Because on M-series you would need AS, or AS-II or similar PIC
installed for this one to implement:
ip nat inside source list 1 pool POOL-02 vrf VRF01 overload
-Alexander
On 5/5/08, GIULIANO (UOL) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People,
I need to convert the
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3085 (20080508) __
The message was checked by ESET
3085 (20080508) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
We use 'encapsulation ethernet-ccc' on all of our T-series and some
M10s for transparent PtP L2VPNs and it works very well. Using
extended-vlan-ccc would require you to start 'caring' about VLANs, so
ethernet-ccc sounds like what you're looking for.
David
2008/5/8 Thor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 3085 (20080508) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
In addition, please be aware that MLPPP or MLFR will require an ASM (on the
M7i), an AS PIC, or an MS PIC.
-Jon
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Alexander Tarkhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Giuliano,
Please, have a look here
Experts,
would it be possible to run an instance of ISIS solely for multicast
routing?
That is: on interface A, B, C I want to run OSPF solely for unicast and
ISIS solely for multicast?
Thanks,
Luca.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
Run both protocols simultaneously. Configure PIM/MSDP to use inet.2
for RPF, then use rib groups and policy to make sure you import your
ISIS and direct routes (but not OSPF) into inet.2.
Stefan Fouant
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Bit Gossip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Experts,
would it be
You're best off getting a regular classic SanDisk with PIO support,
there are no
benefits to be had by putting nice CFs into old and crappy hosts. '
...standard 1G Sandisk [SDCFB-1024-A10] is $18.95 on Amazon...
...and they don't work either. Different point for the same TIMEOUT
11 matches
Mail list logo