Junaid schrieb:
Hi,
> Thanks for the input David. Let me clarify; I am getting default route
> from my upstreams via BGP. But as I mentioned, I want to uplink the
> traffic of some specific customers via one upstream and in case that
> upstream goes down, I want the traffic to take an alternate p
Argghhh I checked the release notes but couldnt' find any
reference to it... Now I need to upgrade.
Thanks folks...
Stefan Fouant
Principal Network Engineer
NeuStar, Inc. - http://www.neustar.biz
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Chuck Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 20
On May 22, 2008, at 10:12 PM, Stefan Fouant wrote:
> Does anyone know if and when when Juniper plans to support
> draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-spec-02 (Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol
> Version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6)? I need it for some IPv6 applications
> which need redundancy.
8.4+ includes suppor
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 04:12:54PM -0400, Stefan Fouant wrote:
> Does anyone know if and when when Juniper plans to support
> draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-spec-02 (Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol
> Version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6)? I need it for some IPv6 applications
> which need redundancy.
It is alr
Does anyone know if and when when Juniper plans to support
draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-spec-02 (Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol
Version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6)? I need it for some IPv6 applications
which need redundancy.
Stefan Fouant
Principal Network Engineer
NeuStar, Inc. - http://www.neustar.biz
BACKGROUND:
I am working with a customer who is using MLPPP. Whenever the directly
connected DACS experiences any sort of redunancy switchover, separate
from an APS switchover, a path AIS is generated which causes the M40's
ct3's to bounce. When this happens, all MLPPP re-negotiation/restart
occur
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:05:08AM -0400, Matthew Crocker wrote:
>
> Doesn't MRV sell a CDWM 'thingy' that will take two GigE links and
> combine them onto a single 2.5 gb Lambda? You would still need to
> eat up to SFP ports on your routers but you would get 2 gbps over the
> same fiber p
Hi,
Thanks for the input David. Let me clarify; I am getting default route
from my upstreams via BGP. But as I mentioned, I want to uplink the
traffic of some specific customers via one upstream and in case that
upstream goes down, I want the traffic to take an alternate path. In
Cisco we used to
C/DWDM+Link Aggregation is your best bet.
Phil
On May 21, 2008, at 4:05 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> Has anyone tried to use 2.5 gig SFP's with Juniper M-series as a drop
> in replacement for regular 1 gig SFP's? The goal is to be able to
> have a 2.5 gig link between an M10i and an M120 over a
On Thursday 22 May 2008, Matthew Crocker wrote:
> Doesn't MRV sell a CDWM 'thingy' that will take two GigE
> links and combine them onto a single 2.5 gb Lambda?
Yes.
> You
> would still need to eat up to SFP ports on your routers
> but you would get 2 gbps over the same fiber pairs with
> Ether
I actually used the MRV thingy for doing just that and it worked very
well.
It's actually a nice CWDM system.
Regards
Amos
On May 22, 2008, at 6:05 PM, Matthew Crocker wrote:
>
> Doesn't MRV sell a CDWM 'thingy' that will take two GigE links and
> combine them onto a single 2.5 gb Lambda? Y
Doesn't MRV sell a CDWM 'thingy' that will take two GigE links and
combine them onto a single 2.5 gb Lambda? You would still need to
eat up to SFP ports on your routers but you would get 2 gbps over the
same fiber pairs with EtherChannel bonding.
Note: 'thingy' is a highly technical term
I'm fiddling around with a J2300 with 2 2-port SHDSL on it.
On the first atm interface, i got the following config :
at-0/0/2 {
encapsulation atm-pvc;
atm-options {
vpi 0;
}
shdsl-options {
line-rate auto;
}
unit 0 {
Is there a specific reason for not having made use of BGP to handle
the failover to your upstream provider(s)? Depending on how you
connect to them, you may or may not require a /24 and your own ASN to
provide proper redundancy. You could even get by with only receiving
a default route from the
Hi,
I am trying to uplink traffic for some of my customers via ISP-1 using
routing-instance on an M-series route (relevant config snippet
attached).
routing-instances {
uplink-to-ISP1-ri {
instance-type forwarding;
routing-options {
static {
route 0
15 matches
Mail list logo
