Hi Dinesh,
Do you have vrf-table-label inside your routing-instance configuration ?
Add this conf and try to ping.
Regards,
./diogo -montagner
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Dinesh Bhonsle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Harry,
>
> I am using a vlan-tagged interface to connect to CE2
>
> ge-0
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:39:56PM +0300, Amos Rosenboim wrote:
> Can you explain the logic behind Cogent BGP topology?
> Are they going through all these configuration efforts just so their
> PE routers will not have to carry full internet feed?
i can't/won't speak directly to the cogent topolo
Hello James,
Can you explain the logic behind Cogent BGP topology?
Are they going through all these configuration efforts just so their
PE routers will not have to carry full internet feed?
Regards
Amos Rosenboim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 20, 2008, at 11:21 PM, James Jun wrote:
Hi, I'm a
> Hi, I'm a small site and I'm just getting ready to go live with a
> cogent connection. But, I'm finding myself a bit confused by their
> Peer A / Peer B description. I can find some examples of multihop
> things, but none seem very clear.
>
> Can someone send a basic cogent bgp setup?
[edit pro
Hi, I'm a small site and I'm just getting ready to go live with a
cogent connection. But, I'm finding myself a bit confused by their
Peer A / Peer B description. I can find some examples of multihop
things, but none seem very clear.
Can someone send a basic cogent bgp setup?
thanks
seph
_
Harry,
I am using a vlan-tagged interface to connect to CE2
ge-0/0/1 {
vlan-tagging;
unit 1 {
vlan-id 1;
family inet {
address 81.1.1.1/24;
}
}
}
Also pe-pe ping for loopback address in global routing instance wor
Are you using any VT interface or lsi? If not, I believe this is
normal. Meaning, when the remote PE pops the label it cannot do an IP
lookup with the vt tunnel/lsi, so its compelled to forward a packet
addressed to its local ifl out the VRF interface. In my experience the
CE, upon receiving such
Hi,
I am not able to get a succesfull vpn ping response fordirectly
connected interface inside a vpn instance in juniper.
CE1-M320-1L3vpn core-M320-2(vpn instance vpn1) (81.1.1.1
)--(81.1.1.2)CE2
when i ping from CE1 to 81.1.1.1 on M320-2, i see that M
Hi all,
Have anyone used NetflowV9 in JunOS?
I'm working on Juniper routers with NetflowV5 now, but I would work on
NetflowV9.
Seems that JunOS support three static templates only. In this templates
same new mpls fields are added but same old NetflowV5 fields (like SRC
and DST AS) are missing.
I think we will start small and will use a J6350. Then when it will be
needed we will upgrade to the advanced license.
We will just have a small throughput in the beginning, so a M7i or
greater would not be needed in the first place.
Matthias
Am 20.08.2008 um 08:37 schrieb Mark Tinka:
On
10 matches
Mail list logo
