On Friday 13 March 2009 02:22:26 am Tore Anderson wrote:
I'll have to monitor the memory utilisation on the
routers for a few more days before I can be certain that
we've nailed the bug, though, but I'm feeling optimistic.
You'll probably want to try disabling the process
yourself. Let me
The question is whether the reboot will be to downgrade to
9.3R2.8, upgrade to the next 9.4 release that fixes this
issue or stick to this release. We're more inclined to the
latter options as 9.4 fixes the traceroute bug seen in MPLS-
based BGP-free cores.
Could you expand a bit on the
On Monday 16 March 2009 11:58:49 pm sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
Could you expand a bit on the traceroute bug and how this
is visible?
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/16700
PR/396280
Although JTAC say this issue is resolved in 9.3R3 for the
9.3 code base. However, as mentioned
Mark,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.net wrote:
It creates a fairly large log file under '/mfs/var/lpdfd/'
every 8hrs, approximately, which, as you say, is where the
leak is occurring.
We've disabled this process too and see RE memory
utilization
Hai...
I need some advised and sample perhaps... I have being searching net, reading
books, get some advise, ARIN/APNIC guide, etc but i still think i miss the idea.
i have block of /22. What is the best way to manage and allocate the ip ...
what iam thinking now is for infra, customer,
Hi
Anybody have some explanation doc about MTU diferences between JUNIPER and
CISCO?
I think that I´m hitting some MTU issues where I have 2 ciscos working ping
with more them 1510 bytes and 2 Juniper or 1 juniper and 1 cisco are not
working.
Regards
Flavio
Cisco includes ip and icmp header size in the total specified packet
size. Payload in the case is 1510-20-8 = 1482 bytes. Juniper adds icmp
and ip header to the payload size you specify. So 1510 becomes 1538
bytes of ip packet.
Thanks,
Nilesh
On Mar 16, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Flavio
On Mar 16, 2009, at 6:58 AM, chenoi A wrote:
Please help me..please do assist me...much appreciate if got sample
of ip plan as my guideline.
thank you in advanced.
Speaking of NANOG, these links may help..
-danny
Begin forwarded message:
From: Danny McPherson da...@tcb.net
Date:
Using snmp might be another option...
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Samit janasa...@wlink.com.np wrote:
Hi,
How do I log the interface flap logs similar to cisco log attached
below, in Juniper M7i?
Dec 3 18:26:04.155 NST: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
POS2/0, changed
Hi,
Does someone know how to check which interface is associated with which
virtual-router? It's a pain to go in each vir and check for associated
interface. any command that works from any vir!!!
Regards,
Vikas Sharma
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
10 matches
Mail list logo
