Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 dhcp-snooping-file

2009-05-05 Thread Jorgen Johnsen
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Chuck Anderson wrote: | Has anyone successfully used the EX4200 dhcp-snooping-file feature on | JunOS 9.4? I have it configured and it created a zero-length file, | but never becomes populated with dhcp snooping binding table | information. I noticed the exact same behavi

[j-nsp] E-VRRP BFD VRRP Support on Juniper Routers

2009-05-05 Thread Andrew Jimmy
Doest Juniper routers support BFD VRRP (like Huwaie E-VRRP) so that you have 50ms standby failover, If not; what are alternatives to achieve 50ms standby failover while using VRRP on Juniper routers. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.n

Re: [j-nsp] Tracking traffic after policers?

2009-05-05 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Chris Adams said: > I have an ethernet with a bunch of customer VLANs on an M10i. The > customers are limited to the bandwidth they pay for with policers. I > collect the traffic stats for graphing via SNMP, but the stats (from the > standard interface MIB) reflect the traffic

Re: [j-nsp] encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services

2009-05-05 Thread Chris Spears
Flexible-vlan-tagging allows for mixing dot1q and QinQ tagging between logical units, not flexible-ethernet-services. As they do different things, both can be applied on the same interface, and even used on the same logical unit. For example, terminating a l2circuit into a switch with stacked

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS Route Distinguisher Question

2009-05-05 Thread Scott Morris
The RD is simply meant to distinguish between routes, not VPNs. You CAN use it on a per-VPN basis, but in the event you are receiving the same route from multiple places within a single VRF and want to employ any controlled decision-making on which way to go, you'll want to separate them (diff

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS Route Distinguisher Question

2009-05-05 Thread Robert Raszuk
Hi William, The Route distinguisher is the VPN instance identifier correct? Incorrect. The only function of RD is to make the routes unique. It has no meaning beyond it. The reason is that between VPNs you may have overlapping address space and if so vpnv4 would get mixed up in the Servi

[j-nsp] MPLS Route Distinguisher Question

2009-05-05 Thread William Jackson
Hi guys Can someone clarify something for me: The Route distinguisher is the VPN instance identifier correct? So it is unique per VPN in the network. And the route target/vrf target is a value that you can assign to prefixes when advertised from local PE router to limit which remote

Re: [j-nsp] error messages on M10

2009-05-05 Thread alain.briant
Hi Seems to be an hardware problem on you memory (RAM) ECC mean that the tranfers in memory are corrupted (Error Correcting code) Since it's telling you that the FEB card is impacted you'de rather try to change it! -Message d'origine- De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:

[j-nsp] error messages on M10

2009-05-05 Thread Amjad Ul Hasnain Qasmi
Hello, I am getting following error messages on my M10 router. My router become unresponsive when they appear and again start working fine after few minutes. Can you guys help on this. May 5 10:49:27 2009 M10-TestRTR feb BCHIP 0: multiple uncorrectable ECC error May 5 10:49:27 2009 M10

Re: [j-nsp] encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services

2009-05-05 Thread Patrik Olsson
In short: Flexible ethernet services allow for mixing Q and QinQ tagging and not using tags on different IFL:s on same physical interface. It also allows the usage of different encapsulations for different IFL:s on smae physical interface. Usable if you want to terminate L3VPN, L2VPN, nat