After a few more rounds with JTAC, it appears the problem lies with
the core not properly switching BGP packets destined for it's own
loopback address.Troubleshooting with Force 10 has indicated a
potentially new FTOS bug.
Thanks for all the replies, both on and off-list.
Jason Dearborn
2009
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 11:33 -0400, Eric Van Tol wrote:
> Understood. Since this is the case, I'd suggest that Juniper fix their JUNOS
> Hardware Validation tool:
>
> http://tools.juniper.net/microcode/
>
> They're getting into Cisco IOS Software Advisor territory by allowing invalid
> hardware
Eric,
We just supplied an M20 FPC-E (JUNIPER Enhanced Flexible PIC Concentrator)
to a customer in Arizona for $3500. He is using it to operate a P-4CHDS3-QPP
which requires the enhanced FPC. Since 9.3 requires same please consider us
as supplier in your search for a spare FPC-E. We can ship withi
> -Original Message-
> From: Stacy W. Smith [mailto:st...@acm.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 10:39 AM
> To: Eric Van Tol
> Cc: juniper-nsp
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 9.3 and M20 FPC
>
> From the 9.3 release notes:
>
> "On M20 routers running JUNOS Release 9.3 and later, nonenhanced FPC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As stated in the reply from Pekka Savola to the threat
"FPC-Offline on M20 after Upgrade JunOS 8.5 to 9.3"
>
> The very, very old FPC's (prior to E-FPC's) no longer work in 9.3,
> as stated in release notes. This may or may not be related.
>
HTH.
/
there is no interface in PIPPO routing-instance; therefore the ping
fails even if I don't specify the source address:
rc2# run ping 1.1.1.2 routing-instance PIPPO
PING 1.1.1.2 (1.1.1.2): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address
The idea was to source the bgp session in routing
From the 9.3 release notes:
"On M20 routers running JUNOS Release 9.3 and later, nonenhanced FPCs do
not come online because of memory limitations. These FPCs appear as
FPC in
the Description column of the output from the show chassis hardware
command.
As announced in Technical Bulletin PSN-2
> -Original Message-
> From: Timo Mohre [mailto:t...@tiscali.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 10:27 AM
> To: Eric Van Tol
> Cc: juniper-nsp
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 9.3 and M20 FPC
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> As stated in the reply from Pekka Savola to the th
Hi all,
Is anyone out there running 9.3 with an M20 FPC (not FPC-E). I have a lab box
that I've upgraded to 9.3R2.8 and the FPC won't come up. The only PIC in this
FPC is a P-4CHDS3 PIC. The FPC basically goes from "Present" state to
"Offline" within a few minutes of booting:
May 5 15:07:06
Does the ping work if you don't specify the source address? This way the ping
can use a source address that is native to the routing-instance, ie a loopback
interface declared in the routing-instance.
run ping 1.1.1.2 routing-instance PIPPO
Cheers
Martin
-Message d'origine-
De : Bit G
Hi Martin,
indeed with rib-group I can import in the routing-instance PIPPO the
connected and local routes, but still BGP doesn't come up because I
think the process can not bind to the address of the local interface
which is still part of a different routing-instance, the default one.
For the
Indeed, the interfaces routes from inet.0 are unknown to your new
routing-instance which is as expected. You can use rib-groups (routing table
groups) to import the connected interface routes into your new
routing-instance.
I haven't tested the exact config below, but the concept is as follow
Martin,
as a 'virtual-router' the protocol configuration commits correctly but
still I have a little problem:
to setup the BGP session, I need the connecting interface in the
routing-instance PIPPO as well as in the global routing-instance for
normal forwarding and this is not accepted :-(
any
Hello
Try "instance-type virtual-router" instead of "instance-type forwarding" to be
able to support routing protocols - this way the commit should work.
"instance-type virtual-router" also support filter-based forwarding.
Cheers
Martin
-Message d'origine-
De : juniper-nsp-boun...@pu
Experts,
I want to configure FilterBasedForwarding and so I need a
routing-instance of type forwarding.
I have no issue to populate the routing-instance with static routes; but
in reality I would like to use bgp to populate it; and this doesn't commit.
Is it possible to use bgp for that? If not,
15 matches
Mail list logo
