Dear All,
How can i configure on the E120 Router to make some users with a
specific doman (i.e .com) to authenticate from a different RADIUS
Servers using pppoe other than the RADIUS Server used by all the other users
Appreciate your help
Thanks
You can use one RADIUS server (cluster as well) for all the domains and decide
on the RADIUS instead of RAS/BRAS. You can use your primary RADIUS as n proxy
for particular domain,user,subnet to redirect/out-source the auth,authrozn,acc
of dial-in user,realm etc to another RADIUS server, which
All,
My juniper m7i suddently rebooted today. The logs show the following. Can
someone tell me what exactly failed. It appears the onboard hard disk was the
issue, but i just wanted to verify.
Aug 12 10:08:11 ibr1.pit /kernel: ata0: resetting devices ..
Aug 12 10:08:11 ibr1.pit
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone has successfully replaced a hard disk on a M7i
RE-5.0. If so with what model disk, and once installed what is the procedure
to get the disk back to working/formatted condition.
Thanks,
Brendan
___
juniper-nsp mailing
Thanks, Harry.
I just checked our routing and noticed that the traffic was entering
the Juniper via a transit MPLS link to another PE, so the VPN label is
the only label on the stack due to PHP. As such, if what Steven
mentions is true re: ABC-chip hardware, then there is no entropy as
I think the issue is that on ABC/M-series we can either do a MPLS hash (up to
two labels), or an IP/L4 hash. It does not seems that you can do both, but I
read somewhere if you only do a 1 label hash then abc/m series can hash on the
IP. Its so hard to keep this straight. Good thing there is
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:19:41 -0400
From: Brendan Mannella bmanne...@teraswitch.com
Sender: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone has successfully replaced a hard disk on a M7i
RE-5.0. If so with what model disk, and once installed what is the procedure
We made the traffic change and now the balancing is even. I am going
to change the config to label-1 payload ip (only) and then shift it
back and see if we can in fact hash on the single label and the iP
header. Hopefully this will suffice!
Cheers,
Chris
On Aug 12, 2009, at 12:50 PM,
Dear Folks,
what should be the As-path reg expression for getting the routes transiting
AS 100 and not originating from AS 100
regards
--
Muhammad Fahad Khan
IT Specialist
Global Technology Services, IBM
fa...@pk.ibm.com
+92-321-2370510
+92-301-8247638
Hi Harry,
On Aug 12, 2009, at 6:50 PM, Harry Reynolds wrote:
T-series platforms with e-fpcs and MX can hash on multiple MPLS
labels while *also* hashing on L3 and l4.
This seems to jive with the docs at:
Without testing It seems like:
set as-path 100not1000orig .* 100 .* (!1000)$
should work.
Thanks,
J Scott
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Fahad Khan fahad.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Folks,
what should be the As-path reg expression for getting the routes transiting
AS 100 and not
Oops. just realized wrong syntax, assumed this was for a different
list. ;) So disregard my last reply!
Anyway, in this answer, you have one THOUSAND in paren instead of 100.
Scott
Judah Scott wrote:
Without testing It seems like:
set as-path 100not1000orig .* 100 .* (!1000)$
should
From what I know, I-chip is like T-series (lmnr) wrt hashing.
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos9.6/information-products/topic-collections/config-guide-policy/policy-configuring-load-balancing-based-on-mpls-labels.html
I'm pretty sure that mx can do mpls plus ip payload, as per above.
13 matches
Mail list logo