[j-nsp] Load Balancing in BGP...

Hi All, I have a question in BGP case study.. for JNCIP topology when we use multipath options in most case studies.. It does show two next-hops.. But I believe we still need load balance on the forwarding option so as to load balance traffic.. But most of the case studies do not include them as

Re: [j-nsp] ERX 1440 FE-8

Make sure that the FE-8 has 256MB of RAM. The FE-8 w/ 128MB is not supported past 5.2. If the line card the copper based one or the SFP one? If it's the SFP based one make sure you have Juniper supported SFPs, otherwise it will fail BPOST. Truman On 24/11/2009, at 1:46 PM, guan wang wrote:

Re: [j-nsp] bgp routes from inet.0 to virtual router instance

Yes, make a RIB group for BGP and you can move routes between instances. You can define a RIB group for a specific family. This is done at the protocols bgp stanza. When using rib groups you don't use instance-import. Truman On 24/11/2009, at 1:04 PM, aayan sulehri wrote: On Tue, Nov 24,

Re: [j-nsp] Load Balancing in BGP...

Has been discussed before : http://www.mail-archive.com/juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net/msg06616.html The answer is Yes, you need to enable it. Thanks Regards, Tarique A. Nalkhande -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net]

[j-nsp] Design questions regarding MX960-Cisco network

Hello, I'm testing a MX960 and coming from a Cisco background I'm having a few problems/design questions regarding integration with the Cisco network. I have the following setup: +-[MX960]-+ | | |Trunk MSTP Trunk| |