[j-nsp] arp logs

Dear All, hope you are doing well. last week i received the below log from juniper box M320 could you help me to prevent my box feom this log kernel: KERN_ARP_ADDR_CHANGE: arp info overwritten for 95.100.26.214 from 00:30:48:b9:60:77 to 00:30:48:b9:b2:1f

[j-nsp] regd RE

Hi, Can anyone point me to a link or document, that states which RE models can go with the router platforms like M320,m160,m20,t1600 etc. What is RE's memory capacity,CPU speed etc. How many maximum routes each model can hold. -- Thanks with regards Shekar.B -- ___

Re: [j-nsp] aggregate ethernet

Excerpts from Taqdir Singh's message of Wed Jan 27 19:26:39 -0800 2010: > Hi Team, > > JUNOS doesn't support layer 2 aggregate ethernet (i mean layer 2 > ether channels ) ? > > and how many max links we can combine in junos, in cisco we can combine upto > 8 ? I would think this would dep

Re: [j-nsp] aggregate ethernet

Yes it does http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos9.5/information-products/topic-collections/config-guide-network-interfaces/jd0e89703.html#jd0e89703 Original Message Subject: [j-nsp] aggregate ethernet Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:56:39 +0530 From: Taqdir Singh To: juniper

Re: [j-nsp] aggregate ethernet

On Thursday 28 January 2010 11:26:39 am Taqdir Singh wrote: > Hi Team, > > JUNOS doesn't support layer 2 aggregate ethernet > (i mean layer 2 ether channels ) ? It does, 802.1AX LACP (802.3ad terminology in JUNOS). > and how many max links we can combine in junos, in cisco > we can co

[j-nsp] aggregate ethernet

Hi Team, JUNOS doesn't support layer 2 aggregate ethernet (i mean layer 2 ether channels ) ? and how many max links we can combine in junos, in cisco we can combine upto 8 ? -- Taqdir Singh Network Engineering (+91) 991-170-9496 | (+91) 801-041-5988 One who asks is a fool for a moment,

[j-nsp] Re-use of PIC cards

what are the limitations on re-using M160 PIC cards, there is a mixture of SONET from OC3 thru OC48 and ethernet 1000 cards. Any thoughts Evan Beware of any enterprise that requires new clothes. HENRY DAVID THOREAU ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper

Re: [j-nsp] RA Discovery and link-local addressing

Thanks Phil and Michael - excellent feedback as always! On 27/01/2010, at 11:11 PM, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 27/01/10 12:06, Ben Dale wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I don't seem to be able to find a definitive answer to this one >> either in Juniper's docs, or the very dry RFCs I've been ploughing >> th

[j-nsp] enabling selected directed broadcasts

I need to participate in a campus-wide "WOL" project that uses UDP directed broadcast packets to transport the "magic WOL" info. I'm running a M120 with JUNOS 9.3R3.8 I've configured my incoming firewall to pass the UDP directed broadcast packets (which come from a specific IPv4 source and have a

Re: [j-nsp] T1 Loopback

Hi Abel, you should be able to identify a loop by checking incoming and outgoing cells. Do the counters increment equally? This also works to identify a local loop on an Ethernet link. There should also be a flag when checking "show interface x/y/z extensive (have a look at line 4): u...@host>

Re: [j-nsp] T1 Loopback

On 1/27/10 5:54 PM, Abel Alejandro wrote: Hello, Is it possible to know if there is a loopback on a T1 interface on a Juniper? If we need to verify if there is a loopback we activate a BERT test and if the BERT synchronizes then we know there is a loopback but I am wondering if there is an easie

[j-nsp] T1 Loopback

Hello, Is it possible to know if there is a loopback on a T1 interface on a Juniper? If we need to verify if there is a loopback we activate a BERT test and if the BERT synchronizes then we know there is a loopback but I am wondering if there is an easier way to verify this. Regards, Abel.

Re: [j-nsp] olive

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 07:51, Jose Madrid wrote: > Taqdir, > > There are step-by-step instructions here: http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Olive ~Chris > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Taqdir Singh wrote: >> Hi, >> >>     Could anyone please explain the ste by step process of installing

Re: [j-nsp] olive

Taqdir, There are step-by-step instructions here: http://blog.gns3.net/2009/10/olive-juniper/ On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Taqdir Singh wrote: > Hi, > >     Could anyone please explain the ste by step process of installing > olive  ? > > I also do have GNS3, but dont know how to make juniper

[j-nsp] olive

Hi, Could anyone please explain the ste by step process of installing olive ? I also do have GNS3, but dont know how to make juniper router work on it. I am using windows vista.. -- Taqdir Singh Network Engineering (+91) 991-170-9496 | (+91) 801-041-5988 One who asks is a fool for a mom

Re: [j-nsp] Access to SNMP-Indexes outside the current routing-instance (Cross RI SNMP-Access)

"Hendrik Kahmann" writes: > I've got a J-Series with two routing-instances configured (voice, data). I > want to access all SNMP-Variables over the instance 'data'. For the > interfaces belonging to this instance everything works fine but I am not > able to access snmp-variables inside the instan

Re: [j-nsp] RA Discovery and link-local addressing

On 27/01/10 12:06, Ben Dale wrote: Hi All, I don't seem to be able to find a definitive answer to this one either in Juniper's docs, or the very dry RFCs I've been ploughing through but: I have an SRX (9.6) running a small IPv6 network (a tunnel and a /48 provided by HE). I have statically all

[j-nsp] Access to SNMP-Indexes outside the current routing-instance (Cross RI SNMP-Access)

Hello, I am currently looking for a solution for the following problem: I've got a J-Series with two routing-instances configured (voice, data). I want to access all SNMP-Variables over the instance 'data'. For the interfaces belonging to this instance everything works fine but I am not able to a

Re: [j-nsp] RA Discovery and link-local addressing

On 27/01/2010, at 11:06 PM, Ben Dale wrote: > This seems counter-intuitive, but it may also be my current lack of RA clue! Hi Ben, I suspect this is normal. I've got a very similar setup to you except I have an SSG5 between the SRX and the Lan and I'm seeing the same thing: michael-dales-macb

[j-nsp] Netscreen accounting with TACACS

Hi, I am able to successfully authenticate and authorized user to access netscreen with the help of Cisco ACS. I am not able to perform accounting of netscreen. There is any possibility to perform accounting via Cisco ACS or any other TACACS or Radius server. Kindly guide me... -- Regards, Atif

[j-nsp] RA Discovery and link-local addressing

Hi All, I don't seem to be able to find a definitive answer to this one either in Juniper's docs, or the very dry RFCs I've been ploughing through but: I have an SRX (9.6) running a small IPv6 network (a tunnel and a /48 provided by HE). I have statically allocated a /64 from the /48 to a vlan

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIS

I stand corrected! ;-) I will hide under my desk now ;-) - "Georg Bachler" schreef: > Hi Nils, > > > JNCIS-E is E Series Track: > > > http://www.juniper.net/us/en/training/certification/erx_track.html#jncise > > JNCIS-M is for M and T Series Track: > > > http://www.juniper.net/us/e

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIS

Hi Nils, JNCIS-E is E Series Track: http://www.juniper.net/us/en/training/certification/erx_track.html#jncise JNCIS-M is for M and T Series Track: http://www.juniper.net/us/en/training/certification/mt_series_track.html#jncism and there is also JNCIS-ER is Enterprise Touting track:

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIS

On 27.01.10 08:31, Nils Kolstein wrote: > The E-track is the Enterprise routing track and focusses on J-series > routers. So some specific J-series hardware-related issues are part > of this track whereas the M-track focuses on the M/T-series. > you're referring to the -ER (enterprise routing) tra

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIS

The E-track is the Enterprise routing track and focusses on J-series routers. So some specific J-series hardware-related issues are part of this track whereas the M-track focuses on the M/T-series. The JunOS element is the same though except for some small J-series specific thingies like tunne