Re: [j-nsp] Use of lt-Interfaces on Juniper MX for binding multiple VPLS Instances to several CCC (unidirectional Ethernet P2P) Servcies RxTx-loop to same interface

Hi Roger ! I am able to glue a VPLS Instance together with a CCC Service using a physical Hairpin. But alas to spend two 10G Interfaces just to stich a service Next thing i tried was to use the LT-Interface. I was surprised to see that i can only replicate unidirectional Traffic (eg

Re: [j-nsp] Use of lt-Interfaces on Juniper MX for binding multiple VPLS Instances to several CCC (unidirectional Ethernet P2P) Servcies RxTx-loop to same interface

Hi, Can you share more details of application requiring such transitions? Why not just use p2mp lsps inside vlps for flooded traffic:

Re: [j-nsp] Use of lt-Interfaces on Juniper MX for binding multiple VPLS Instances to several CCC (unidirectional Ethernet P2P) Servcies RxTx-loop to same interface

Hi ! We have a very special customer which is very sensible on packet loss. We tried VPLS with P2MP LSP and we have untolerable packet loss when we add/remove a leaf to/from the P2MP Tree. We also have to provide the make befor break feature in situations when a wan link is taken out of order

[j-nsp] matching NO community

Experts, in Junos policy language, is it possible, and how, to match route with NO community attached? Bit ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] SNMP Trap

Hi All, I am working on SNMP Traps, we have configured SNMP-V3 on our Juniper T-Series Router, has per SNMP-V3 Trap PDU format, I see only SysUpTime on my SNMP Trap Receiver. However my SNMP Server time and Router Time is different, due to this I am not able to co-releate at what time Trap is

[j-nsp] inet.3, MPLS VPN troubeshoot

i'm new to juniper, i come from cisco background. i'm trying to build InterAS OptionC MP-eBGP with Cisco on one side and Juniper on other. Two issues i have - 1. I stumbled upon inet.3 table. In case of ldp signaled mpls vpn setup, how does inet.3 get populated? I had to add a static discard

Re: [j-nsp] matching NO community

-Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bit Gossip Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 9:52 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] matching NO community Experts, in Junos policy language, is

Re: [j-nsp] Joining OPSF IS-IS areas via 2 ABRs

Smith W. Stacy says Hi Clarke, I believe I have an answer for you... Smith: I really want to thank you for the full diagram and thoughtful config. That's a great solution. Your use of logical tunnel interfaces to bring the different logical routers together is a clean way to do it,

Re: [j-nsp] weird MTU size on show interface

On Saturday, October 02, 2010 04:58:35 am Chris Evans wrote: Cisco is different. They typically don't include layer 2 overhead on the display/config where as juniper does... In IOS XR, Cisco now do. On Ethernet, for instance, in IOS XR on the CRS, for example, you'd have to explicitly add

Re: [j-nsp] Joining OPSF IS-IS areas via 2 ABRs

That's Stacy for you. ;) I believe you get a 1Gbps tunnel for free. For 10G you do per a pfe port. Regards -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Clarke Morledge Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 2:57 PM