IIRC the default is:
Downstream Unsolicited label distribution (as opposed to Downstream on Demand),
Ordered label distribution control (as opposed to Independent), with Liberal
label retention mode (as opposed to Conservative).
HTHs
-Original Message-
From:
I would suggest opening a case with JTAC to troubleshoot further. This is
not an expected behavior. Please attach the CLI and messages logs from both
the attempt to configure LRs. Also, provide RSI output.
Thanks,
On 10/27/10 8:34 AM, Vladislav Vasilev vvasi...@vvasilev.net wrote:
I've got
Thanks Harry, this agrees with the behavior i'm seeing, i've got a similar
setup as below,
P1P2P5---P6
| |
| |
P3-P4
Where P1-4 are Juniper T's running 9.3, P5 is a M40e on 8.5 and P6 is an ERX
705 with JunosE 8.0, all routers participate in a flat OSPF area, LDP is
What you want to do is use VTI on the Cisco side. Search for Cisco VTI
(Virtual Tunnel Interface) or tunnel protection for more info config
examples.
With tunnel protect, you can create a routable virtual tunnel that uses
0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0 as the proxy ID and it interoperates just fine with
I would figure an LT interface like other platforms but it doesn't allow for
an encapsulation. Ideas?
{master:0}[edit interfaces lt-0/0/0]
l...@s13# show
unit 0 {
point-to-point;
peer-unit 1;
family inet {
address 10.1.2.1/30;
}
}
unit 1 {
peer-unit 0;
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:07:06PM +0200, William Jackson wrote:
We are debating which is the better route to go.
We already have STM-64/Ethernet capable ADM's and we were considering
which would be the best option?
1.Terminate the STM-64 circuits into our MX boxes using type 3
FPC's.
2010/10/27 Tom Devries tom.devr...@rci.rogers.com
Indeed, the only issue I see with policy based vpn's is the number of vpn
policies required for the amount of networks that have to be encrypted. As
someone pointed out on another list, the C device should support null proxy
ids if you first
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:25:27PM +0400, Pavel Lunin wrote:
Hi,
Anyone here uses dynamic-db? Works? or as always? :)
I tried, but there is no support for it via Netconf, which pretty much
makes it a non-starter for me. :) I'm sure something else about it is
broken too, I just never got
Richard,
I knew you should tried it :) Thank you.
More and more signs that there is no many implementations but a lot of
skepticism around it.
2010/10/28 Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:25:27PM +0400, Pavel Lunin wrote:
Hi,
Anyone here uses dynamic-db?
9 matches
Mail list logo
