+2 to Mr. Richard.. Could you please explain the same for MX-960 trio-mpc..
Thanks
BR//Masood
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:31:37 -0500
From: r...@e-gerbil.net
To: go...@live.com
CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] routing updates between PFEs and Kernal
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010
Hello. Thanks for all the stories from everyone.
I disabled some pretty nasty (lots of port matches) terms and the issue
went away for a few weeks.
I've just edited this term, by adding an IP to the destination-prefix-list:
[edit firewall family ethernet-switching filter ci_infra]
- term
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 09:49:02PM -0600, Richard A Steenbergen
r...@e-gerbil.net wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:51:26AM +0800, Gavin Tweedie wrote:
I also have a case open with JTAC.
For
example, if you configured a single term to match on 0.0.0.0/8,
1.0.0.0/8, or 3.0.0.0/8,
(ex-platform causes death/dismemberment/pain/anguish)
On 12/15/10 09:18, Charlie Allom wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 09:49:02PM -0600, Richard A Steenbergen
r...@e-gerbil.net wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:51:26AM +0800, Gavin Tweedie wrote:
I also have a case open with JTAC.
For
Hi,
FYI splitting it up into _udp and _tcp only spiked the pfem for seconds,
rather than 2 hours like this time (below).
Thanks again for all the info.
C.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 02:16:11PM +, Charlie Allom
char...@playlouder.com wrote:
Hello. Thanks for all the stories from everyone.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:00:10AM -0500, Chris Morrow morr...@ops-netman.net
wrote:
(ex-platform causes death/dismemberment/pain/anguish)
On 12/15/10 09:18, Charlie Allom wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 09:49:02PM -0600, Richard A Steenbergen
r...@e-gerbil.net wrote:
Richard how did
We're seeing what seems to be an interoperability problem when we configure PIM
Sparse-mode Rendezvous Point on either m10i or mx240 and the PIM source
registration messages are coming from cisco routers where the cfeb's, fpc's and
dpc's go to 100% cpu utilization all the time. The box stops
Hi Phil,
Could you share some additional info? This certainly sounds like either a
misconfiguration or a bug, but without additional info, it's very hard to
diagnose.
Helpful info would include:
JUNOS version
relevant config snippets from the Juniper RP and Cisco first-hop routers
'show pim
On M10is acting as RP, do you a route similar to this in the kernel and
cfeb?
R.R.R.R.S.S.S.S.103.a.b.c.d/104 --- pd-x/y/z
To check this in the RE kernel you need to do show route forwarding-table
and in the cfeb show route ip
R.R.R.R is the address configured as RP and S.S.S.S is the address
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Philip Palanchi
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 11:36 AM
To: juniper-nsp
Subject: [j-nsp] PIM SM RP issue
We're seeing what seems to be an interoperability
Sure thing. I'll pull this info tomorrow. The m10i has 9.6R4.4 with ASII PIC.
It's a one-armed router and it's only mission is to be the PIM-SM RP.
Thanks,
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Smith W. Stacy st...@acm.org
To: Philip Palanchi palan...@rutgers.edu
Cc: juniper-nsp
You mean RP-on-stick scenario?
On 12/15/10 4:55 PM, Philip Palanchi palan...@rutgers.edu wrote:
Sure thing. I'll pull this info tomorrow. The m10i has 9.6R4.4 with ASII PIC.
It's a one-armed router and it's only mission is to be the PIM-SM RP.
Thanks,
Phil
- Original Message -
12 matches
Mail list logo
