Hi Michael
It already configured in a group. Also I was trying to telnet from directly
connected ip.
groups {
node0 {
system {
host-name FW1;
}
interfaces {
fxp0 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Richard A Steenbergen
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 7:16 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] about 10.4R3 on EX
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at
Has anyone tried to install for example
install-media64-10.4R3.4-export? I tried to install this on
M10i(RE-850, Intel Pentium III i686) with not much luck as I ended up
in debugging subshell:
ERROR: Package jbundle is not compatible - amd64 vs {i386}
ERROR: jbundle-10.4R3.4-export fails
I finally bought SanDisk SDCFJ-1024 CF card and it worked just fine!
I managed to install install-media-10.4R3.4-export.
Just for information, if I insert this SDCFJ-1024 CF into my Linux
machine, following data is logged into kernel message buffer:
root@ubuntu:~# uname -srv
Linux
It's a by design behavior. When control link or fabric link disconnected,
the current RG0 master node will remain in master status but the current
RG0 backup node will disable itself to avoid split-brain issue, Disable
means the node will offline all SPC/NPC and Line Card. And only reboot the
Hi Marting
I believe this image is supported on the new RE-S-1800's as well at the
JCS. I does not work on the m10i.
On 2011/03/23 12:50, Martin T wrote:
Has anyone tried to install for example
install-media64-10.4R3.4-export? I tried to install this on
M10i(RE-850, Intel Pentium III i686)
Has anyone tried to install for example
install-media64-10.4R3.4-export? I tried to install this on
M10i(RE-850, Intel Pentium III i686) with not much luck as I ended up
in debugging subshell:
...
It was rather expected as PIII should have no 64bit support.
Which platforms support 64bit
I recommend using a backup-router as well.
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Walaa Abdel razzak
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 1:19 AM
To: Michael Lee; EXT - plu...@senetsy.ru
Cc: juniper-nsp
Subject:
Hi Martin,
From the price-list of today, I have been reviewing that there are only RE
of 64bit for T1600 and T640. These are the models of RE's:
RE-DUO-C1800-8G-BB Routing engine with dual core 1800MHz processor, SSD
and 8GB memory, Base Bundle T1600, T640 RE-DUO-C1800-8G-R Routing engine
The 64-bit versions of Junos are the for the new routing engines for the MX
series. They're coming with 64-bit processors and SSD hard drives.
Doug
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Martin T
Sent:
2011/3/23 Chen Jiang iloveb...@gmail.com
It's a by design behavior. When control link or fabric link disconnected,
the current RG0 master node will remain in master status but the current
RG0 backup node will disable itself to avoid split-brain issue, Disable
means the node will offline all
Once upon a time, Anton Delport adelp...@juniper.net said:
I believe this image is supported on the new RE-S-1800's as well at the
JCS. I does not work on the m10i.
The download page should probably note this better; right now, the 64
bit image is first in the list and says it works on M and MX
No need to install in on M10i just because it has a 1-core 32-bit CPU and
less (much less :) than 4GB of RAM which you can address (the only advantage
of 64-bit JUNOS by now) with x64. So even if you'd managed to push it into
RE-850, it wouldn've given you anything.
2011/3/23 Martin T
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 01:48:04PM -0700, Kaj Niemi wrote:
It took 838 seconds on a 2 member EX4200 VC bundle. Yes, I did time it. ;-)
Around 13 minutes downtime for a EX3200...
Best regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: d...@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
Hi Doug,
Seems like filters+policers allows you to specify bandwidth-limit
and burst-size..
I.e. if you had a pool of 10 mbps.. you could carve it into individual
customer chunks at their... But no way to allow the customer to burst above
that bandwidth-limit to some specified higher
I hear what you're saying, but again I'm not an expert in QoS, so I can only
offer limited guidance. I would love to hear more feedback from the rest of
the community.
It may be possible to use a policer with the loss-priority knob instead of
immediately discarding the packets. So at a
Seems like filters+policers allows you to specify bandwidth-limit
and burst-size..
I.e. if you had a pool of 10 mbps.. you could carve it into individual
customer chunks at their... But no way to allow the customer to burst above
that bandwidth-limit to some specified higher BW, only
There's also a feature in Junos called prefix-action, which enforces per-prefix
policing. However I don't believe it's available on the EX.
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos94/swconfig-policy/prefix-action.html
Doug
From: EXT - plu...@senetsy.ru
Sent: Wednesday, March 23,
Hi Pavel,
Each customer is on a separate non-overlapping subnet, but
NOT on a different VLAN generally.. So filtering at the subnet level is
easy.. does this change your response at all?
Peter Kranz
www.UnwiredLtd.com http://www.unwiredltd.com/
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
Mobile:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Daniel Roesen d...@cluenet.de wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 01:48:04PM -0700, Kaj Niemi wrote:
It took 838 seconds on a 2 member EX4200 VC bundle. Yes, I did time it. ;-)
Around 13 minutes downtime for a EX3200...
Best regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE --
I create my policers per subnet for convenience. You can do them per IP by
simply using /32 but if each customer has a dedicated cider block, it'll be
pretty straight forward.
Here's how I do it:
on an interface, (this is from a MX, but similar context on a srx)
unit 201 {
family inet
Hi Will,
If I undertand correctly, this version handles a CIR with a certain
burst-size in terms of bits.. But doesn't handle the need to allow ongoing
bursts above 'bandwidth-limit' if the resources are available.. That
unfortunately is the gist of the problem that makes it more difficult
Each customer is on a separate non-overlapping subnet, but
NOT on a different VLAN generally.. So filtering at the subnet level is
easy.. does this change your response at all?
No, not too much. Even worse :) Though, if so, you can try to implement
this on EX using an
ok, thanks for the clarification!
regards,
martin
2011/3/23 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net:
Once upon a time, Anton Delport adelp...@juniper.net said:
I believe this image is supported on the new RE-S-1800's as well at the
JCS. I does not work on the m10i.
The download page should probably
The burst is there to allow traffic to behave nicely. In real life, it allows
TCP some time to resize and adjust. If you just lop off traffic it gets a
little ugly on performance.
You *really* want to combine this with some sort of prioritizer like qos to
make it behave the way you want.
On
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:15 PM, TiM t...@muppetz.com wrote:
On Wed, March 23, 2011 8:54 am, Kaj Niemi wrote:
Hi,
sarcasm
To whomever who decided to introduce new features in a R3 release, thanks
;-( Specifically installing jloader separately is highly appreciated.
/sarcasm
You'll
So, I'm looking for some form of stacking router/switch solution that could
handle BGP/OSPF/~75 MIR and CIR rules per interface with enforcement by
customer subnet (they are all on the same interface and vlan)/and tcpdump
for easy debug of customer connectivity problems..
Possible with
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:28 AM, jbues...@jb-internetworking.com wrote:
Hi there,
I have the following issue:
switch1--(ciscoPE)-(MX80)switch2
switch3
Switch1 is connected to a Cisco PE
Switch2 and switch 2 are connected to a MX80
28 matches
Mail list logo
