hey,
> I tried too, but I ve the same behavior ! IIH discarded at the ERX side.
router isis foobar
domain-authentication psnp
domain-authentication csnp
?
--
tarko
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/m
Hey David,
I believe its expected behavior when you setup ptp to stop sending iih pkts.
Do you know if the erx has igmp snooping? this really sounds like the
issue we were facing on links that traversed our (ex) in between. I know
yours is an erx but if igmp snooping is enabled, it will discar
Thanks.
I tried too, but I ve the same behavior ! IIH discarded at the ERX side.
Moreover when i configure my interface in point-to-point the ERX stops sending
IIH ! So strange. The MX has already ISIS adjacencies with ALU 7750, other
Juniper T and M series and Cisco boxes as well. I don't un
Richard - you are right about the scope here, but we are working towards
progress in this area. It's not easy! Hopefully you'll start to see progress
over the next few months in terms of content visibility and usefulness. And
beyond that we have other efforts underway for further improvements.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:38:22AM -0700, Jim Boyle wrote:
> You can also take a look at the results from our online PRSearch application.
>
> http://www.juniper.net/prsearch/
>
> Select 10.4R3, or 10.4R4 and show the results "Closed" in that
> release. That will show available PRs with commits
Hi David,
Could you try to put the authentication with md5? I say this because when I
was doing interoperability between JunOS and IOS, I noted that the simple
authentication don't work correctly. Maybe the hash-key is not compatible
when you use the simple authentication.
Now we are using md5 as
You can also take a look at the results from our online PRSearch application.
http://www.juniper.net/prsearch/
Select 10.4R3, or 10.4R4 and show the results "Closed" in that release. That
will show available PRs with commits/resolution in that release ("Closed" isn't
quite accurate here as the
correction:
point-to-point is configured under the interface on the erx
" interface blah/0
isis network point-to-point "
-Payam
Payam Chychi wrote:
Hey,
Have you tried setting each side up as a. Point-to-point network? Its
done under protocol isis
Try that and see if it works. If so, ur dst
Hey,
Have you tried setting each side up as a. Point-to-point network? Its
done under protocol isis
Try that and see if it works. If so, ur dst mac on one side is getting
filtered (by the device itself or perhaps your provider)
On 5/20/11, david@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't
> I don't know how to go on with the ERX. I tried many things without success.
> More traces below. Thanks for your help : May be a bug ?!?
Have you tried without authentication?
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no
___
juniper-nsp maili
Hi,
I don't know how to go on with the ERX. I tried many things without success.
More traces below. Thanks for your help : May be a bug ?!?
Regards,
David
ERX :
###
interface loopback 50
ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.255
no ip redirects
!
interface gigabitEthernet 12/0
mtu 4
(replying back to list if you don't mind)
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 17:07, Nick Slabakov wrote:
> http://www.juniper.net/us/en/community/junos/training-certification/day-one/networking-technologies-series/this-week-deploying-mpls/
>
> which has the best description of RSVP automesh functionality I
12 matches
Mail list logo
