[j-nsp] What do you think about the MX line?

Hello, I've been doing some research into using the MX line of Juniper routers and was interested in hearing people's experiences (the good, bad, and ugly). What do you like about them? What do you dislike? Where are you putting them in your network? Where are you not putting them? Why? What

[j-nsp] Output for show bgp summary is showing different on two REs

Hello, I have observed a different scenario, i don't know wthr it is by expected or not. Router has two REs and GRES, NSR is enabled also commit synchronize is there. But while checking the output for show bgp summary then on Master RE everything is showing ok. On the other hand backup RE is

Re: [j-nsp] Output for show bgp summary is showing different on two REs

-Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of saurabh sood Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 9:41 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] Output for show bgp summary is showing different on two REs

Re: [j-nsp] Output for show bgp summary is showing different on two REs

Thanks for this good answer. Even I was thinking the same but unfortunately when I tried the same on one of my other router then i saw the following: Master RE: {master} lab show bgp summary Groups: 2 Peers: 2 Down peers: 0 Table Tot Paths Act Paths SuppressedHistory Damp State

Re: [j-nsp] What do you think about the MX line?

I'm very happy with it, but I've only got MX960s. It's a fantastic platform for user aggregation. I use it to police per individual IP across a couple of /16s. Soon I'll be rolling out NAT services for a /16 of private space for wireless users. I'd like to get some of the new smaller boxes, but

Re: [j-nsp] Output for show bgp summary is showing different on two REs

-Original Message- From: saurabh sood [mailto:saurabh...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 10:18 AM To: Stefan Fouant Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Output for show bgp summary is showing different on two REs Thanks for this good answer. Even I was

Re: [j-nsp] Output for show bgp summary is showing different on twoREs

If the BGP peer in the master Routing Engine has negotiated address-family capabilities that are not supported for nonstop active routing, then the corresponding BGP neighbor state on the backup Routing Engine shows as idle. On switchover, the BGP session is reestablished from the new master

Re: [j-nsp] Output for show bgp summary is showing different on twoREs

It will help me to narrowdown this issue. Thanks On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Alex alex.arsen...@gmail.com wrote: If the BGP peer in the master Routing Engine has negotiated address-family capabilities that are not supported for nonstop active routing, then the corresponding BGP neighbor

Re: [j-nsp] Output for show bgp summary is showing different on twoREs

Yeah, I would suggest restarting the backup RE and see if it comes into the proper state as well... Stefan Fouant JNCIE-M #513, JNCIE-ER #70, JNCI http://www.shortestpathfirst.net GPG Key ID: 0xB4C956EC -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-