Hi Keegan,
Keep in mind that you can only configure the tunnel bandwidth according
with the actual port speed on the DPC. If you have a 10ge dpc you must use a
10g tunnel bandwidth config (and as Harry mentioned you lose a port) and in
case you have a 1g DPC you must use a 1g tunnel bandwith co
So the fpc restart fixed the issue?
AFAIK, the 1g tunnel is free, 10g burns a port.
Regards
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Keegan Holley
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 1:56 PM
To: juniper-nsp
Su
We are using the following to dedicate fpc bandwidth instead of disabling
tunnel services. I've been told it's faster but disables a gig interface to
cannibalize the asics. It however requires a fpc restart. I suppose a RTM
is in order. Thanks all for the input.
set chassis fpc 0 pic 0 tunnel
I think I have seen similar if ifl encap is not correct. This was working for
me on a dpc/mx:
ge-3/0/0 {
flexible-vlan-tagging;
encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services;
unit 101 {
encapsulation vlan-vpls; #<<<
vlan-id 101;
}
}
Ok, I'm stumped. Configuring vpls and everything seems to be working but
the local router interfaces. They come up as NP or hardware not present.
The DPC and pic are up and working fine and I've tried it with "tunnel
bandwidth 1g" configured under the chassis stanza as well as no tunnel
services
Hi All
I have a requirement in my typical LAN scenario whereby my LAN server
connects in a dual homed fashion to two different LAN switches from a third
party vendor. We are using vrrp for the server LAN. The two 3rd party vendor
switches are uplinked via L3 links to two ex-4500. We are tracking th
6 matches
Mail list logo