Would it no be advisae to either teace it or a tcpdump from the OS you can
see what packets are being sent and received on the interface?
Generally yes, but. Though this doesn't seem to be the case for Jeroen since
he uses eBGP with direct interface address peering, you must keep in mind
that
I would like to thank all the people that gave such helpful insights on
this issue.
I think Paul's detailed explanation, and the contributions kindly
provided by Chan, Will, Richard and another person in private email,
close the issue: I am reconfiguring for default routing. I hope people
On 13/10/11 20:21, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
EX8200 uses SRAM for forwarding lookups, and TCAM for firewall
filtering. SRAM is perfectly capable of doing lookups at these speeds,
and infact is a lot more flexible than TCAM, whereas TCAM is actually
much better suited for doing high speed
Once upon a time, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk said:
On that topic; I'm familiar with how TCAM can be used to accelerate
routing lookups, but less so with SRAM. Is the SRAM used to implement a
simple lookup table/tree, or does SRAM have some special properties
that enable it to do
On 10/14/11 03:08 , Phil Mayers wrote:
On 13/10/11 20:21, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
EX8200 uses SRAM for forwarding lookups, and TCAM for firewall
filtering. SRAM is perfectly capable of doing lookups at these speeds,
and infact is a lot more flexible than TCAM, whereas TCAM is actually
Interesting. It's a stack. I guess I'll have to use multihoming. Just for
fun I'm going to see if I can get it to pass the untagged BPDUs.
Thanks,
Keegan
2011/10/12 Phil Bedard phil...@gmail.com
Standards-based STP BPDUs are sent untagged, which might be an issue if
the links to your CE
[Apologies if you've already seen this announcement in other forums.]
Request for participation - Arbor 2011 Worldwide Infrastructure Security
Report.
-
Folks,
We're in the process of collecting survey responses for the 2011 Worldwide
Infrastructure Security Report (WWISR); this is the
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Michele Bergonzoni berg...@labs.it wrote:
can only be done with TCAM. For those who want more info on this issue, this
is the very interesting reference that I received in a private email:
http://www.firstpr.com.au/ip/sram-ip-forwarding/
I wouldn't use that
All,
After finally finding some free time (a new job or two, and a new kid)
I was able to at least sit down and hack out a base version of my SRX
Session Analyzer. For those of you who used NSSA (Netscreen Session
Analyzer) I wrote it to assist in troubleshooting Juniper firewalls.
Basically
We are in the process of enabling traffic engineering with shortcuts for
ISIS on an IP\MPLS based network. As a result of enabling ISIS traffic
engineering with shortcuts, IP traffic will utilize the LSP paths (inet.3)
for the forwarding decision. Is there a configuration feature so the IP
10 matches
Mail list logo
