On Sunday, October 16, 2011 09:56:41 AM Julien Goodwin
wrote:
I do object to the still vaporware, not due to ship
until the end of the year is closer. The main threat to
the T-series is that 10ge slowly removing the need for
Sonet/SDH,...
But on the flip side, a lot of folk are still
On Sunday, October 16, 2011 02:33:57 AM Richard A
Steenbergen wrote:
All the hardware in
the world doesn't help you if you don't have the right
software, and C/J shockingly don't want to make a $10k
box that obsoletes the need for a $1mil T-series.
I don't think it's terribly shocking :-).
On 16/10/11 16:55, Mark Tinka wrote:
and if all you need is 10g LAN-PHY the MX
with the 16-port MIC does it nicely.
There should be a newer version of this line card coming
with WAN-PHY support.
10g WAN-PHY helps, but isn't actually enough.
Some long-haul applications require actual
On Sunday, October 16, 2011 01:59:29 PM Julien Goodwin
wrote:
10g WAN-PHY helps, but isn't actually enough.
Preaching to the choir :-).
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
Hi there.
I'm trying to understand the advantage of using mpls traffic-engineering
bgp-igp-both-ribs versus mpls traffic-engineering bgp-igp. Is there an
advantage to loading up both tables that I am missing?
Our goal is LSP mesh, iBGP, OSPF, OSPFv3, l2vpn, and l3vpn. With what I can
On 16/10/11 13:28, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
snip openflow rant
Of course the traditional router vendors are also realizing that they
won't be able to compete on price given the massive volumes that third
party ASIC makers are doing, so they've already started building systems
around
Hi Paul,
Those two commands moves the LSP routes from inet.3 to inet.0. As the first
one leaves them in inet.3, the second one not. In this way they are used for
all IP traffic, because by default the LSP routes are with lower metric. In
normal VPN MPLS core you don't need this as all you need to
Thank you - that makes more sense now.. Appreciate it.
Paul
From: Ivan Ivanov [mailto:ivanov.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 10:34 AM
To: Paul Stewart
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MPLS TE Question
Hi Paul,
Those two commands moves the LSP
Hi Peter,
IGP shortcuts should import more routes in inet.3 for the purposes of BGP
resolving, as is described in the link below.
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.4/topics/concept/mpls-igp-shortcuts.html?searchid=1318793088423
It will not copy anything to inet.0. Do you have
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Julien Goodwin
jgood...@studio442.com.au wrote:
Arista is the one company that seems poised to actually take this on and
keep coming out with good hardware, at a decent price, with a powerful,
open control plane. Their kit isn't Openflow interoperable yet that
10 matches
Mail list logo
