Hello,
As far as I understand you are talking of OSPF/LDP and BGP in the same site.
Our implementation have the protocols on different sites. I made some tests
and the problem I see is
that on the site with BGP there are no routes with label advertised towards
the client carrier router.
There
[Apologies if you've already seen this message in other forums.]
We'd be grateful if folks who've yet to do so would take a few minutes to
participate in the 2011 WISR opsec survey - responses will be tabulated on
Sunday, 20Nov11, and input from the operational community is greatly
appreciated
Hi,
I don't see why you can't.
We have one running in our network.
Depending on your CoC node topology, you may need to be extra watchful on
potential loops or unefficient routing caused primarily by next-hops being
mutually distributed by OSPF/LDP and BGP.
On Nov 16, 2011, at 9:41 PM, Tasho
Hello,
Can anyone tell me if it is possible to have Carrier-of-Carriers working
scenario with one site implemented
with OSPF/LDP and the other using eBGP with labeled-unicast?
Thanks in advance,
Tasho Shukerski
Vivacom
Network engineer
___
juniper-nsp
On Friday 11 November 2011 17:42:29 Mike Williams wrote:
> So. VPLS. Point-to-multiple-point. Virtual LAN. Brilliant!
I managed build up the courage, and time, to have a crack at this today,
figuring it could take while.
However it took me less than an hour to convert my mesh of l2vpns to a VPLS
5 matches
Mail list logo