Re: [j-nsp] MX as BRAS / demux

2011-11-17 Thread Bjørn Tore
Den 17.11.2011 23:03, skrev George Vlachos: Try the "no-gratuitous-arp-request" on the interface. The physical interface has it configured already. /BT ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [j-nsp] MX as BRAS / demux

2011-11-17 Thread George Vlachos
Try the "no-gratuitous-arp-request" on the interface. -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bjorn Tore Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 7:32 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] MX as BRAS /

Re: [j-nsp] MX as BRAS / demux

2011-11-17 Thread Jeff Wheeler
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Bjørn Tore wrote: >        interfaces { >            demux0 { >                no-gratuitous-arp-request; On other types of interfaces, you would also need no-gratuitous-arp-reply, but it can't be configured there. :-/ Perhaps there is an ER#? -- Jeff S Wheele

[j-nsp] MX as BRAS / demux

2011-11-17 Thread Bjørn Tore
Guys, Anybody have a clue here? Seems like a bug; when configuring the MX with DPC with proxy arp and dynamic-profiles { MY_PROFILE { interfaces { demux0 { no-gratuitous-arp-request; unit "$junos-interface-unit" { prox

Re: [j-nsp] Carrier-of-Carriers question

2011-11-17 Thread Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim
Tasho, It'll work but you need to have both OSPF/LDP and BGP labeled-unicast on all routers in your network. You'll need 'resolve-vpn' knob under labeled-unicast BGP protocol to install the next-hop into inet.3. I don't believe there's a way to distribute routes/label info similar to a routing