Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T-DC vs MX80-5G-DC-B

2011-11-19 Thread magno
Hi all, these codes are basically the same, both are MX80 based devices with a MIC 1x20GE (all mics are commercially called 3D, no difference here) already installed in one of the two available slots. On MX5 (and in the commercial bundle MX80-5) the 20x1G MIC is the only card available to

Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T-DC vs MX80-5G-DC-B

2011-11-19 Thread Saku Ytti
On 19 November 2011 10:21, magno massimo.magn...@gmail.com wrote: 2) the T versions (all the T versions, MX5, 10,40 and also MX80-T) supports Sync-E according with G.8261 / G.8262 standards; All modular MX80 boxes should do SyncE. But IEEE 1588-2008 (PPT) needs better oscillator and -T denotes

Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T-DC vs MX80-5G-DC-B

2011-11-19 Thread Jonas Frey (Probe Networks)
Hello, Hi all, these codes are basically the same, both are MX80 based devices with a MIC 1x20GE (all mics are commercially called 3D, no difference here) already installed in one of the two available slots. On MX5 (and in the commercial bundle MX80-5) the 20x1G MIC is the only card

Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T-DC vs MX80-5G-DC-B

2011-11-19 Thread Jonas Frey (Probe Networks)
Hi Nico, which JunOS are you running? 10.4R7.5 here. Maybe they changed it on later MX5/10/40 bundles or its now beeing enforced on newer JunOS versions (just as i said)... Best regards, Jonas Am Samstag, den 19.11.2011, 18:46 +0100 schrieb Nicolaj Kamensek: Am 19.11.2011 17:52, schrieb

Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T-DC vs MX80-5G-DC-B

2011-11-19 Thread Pavel Lunin
That is not true. The ports are configurable and usable. But you need a license to be allowed to use them. The license is just paperwork and you dont need to activate it somewhere. However this policy will change in the future, all MX5/10/40 bundles and line cards are EEPROM coded and a later

Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T-DC vs MX80-5G-DC-B

2011-11-19 Thread magno
Quote: That is not true. The ports are configurable and usable. But you need a license to be allowed to use them. The license is just paperwork and you dont need to activate it somewhere. However this policy will change in the future, all MX5/10/40 bundles and line cards are EEPROM coded and a

[j-nsp] SRX650 Dual SRE6

2011-11-19 Thread GIULIANO (WZTECH)
People, Does anyone knows if SRX650 box supports dual SRE6 (Services and Routing Engine 6) ? It is possible with JUNOS 11.4 (last version available) to use both routing engines ? Any special configuration to do ... for this both SRE6 to work ? We have tried dual SRE6 ... but what happen

Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Dual SRE6

2011-11-19 Thread Tim Eberhard
It's been well known that the dual RE design while there is space in the chassis it's not supported in software as of today. I just looked at the release notes and I can't find any reference to dual RE's being supported. Did you expect it to be a feature there? I'm honestly not aware of it being