On (2012-01-10 07:26 +0100), Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 04:02:14PM -0600, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
FWIW they've actually had serious problems interoperating correctly with
copper SFPs from other vendors, on EX and MX. There are still unsolved
issues with ports
On 01/10/2012 12:35 AM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
In theory the way it's supposed to work is that a cryptographically
verifiable code based on the serial number (probably some sort of hash,
but no clue what they actually use) is written to the EEPROM. That way,
Cisco can give the actual
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:11:43AM +0200, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2012-01-10 07:26 +0100), Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 04:02:14PM -0600, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
FWIW they've actually had serious problems interoperating correctly with
copper SFPs from other vendors,
* Humair Ali humair.s@gmail.com [2011-12-23 16:41]:
Sebastian,
you should be able to achieve what you want by using Virtual Switch Routing
instance instead of VPLS routing instance.
you can confirgure a Virtual Switch instance with protocol VPLS in it , and
create a bridge-domains to
Hi Artur,
checked it with SRX100 (JUNOS 11.4R1.6) and it is not a hidden command:
[edit system syslog host 1.1.1.1]
root@host# set ?
Possible completions:
allow-duplicates Do not suppress the repeated message
any All facilities
+ apply-groups Groups from which to
On Tuesday 10 of January 2012 14:46:55 Loos, Christian wrote:
Hi Artur,
checked it with SRX100 (JUNOS 11.4R1.6) and it is not a hidden command:
The question was about Junos 10. Port command was hidden there:
[edit]
root@firewall# run show version
Hi
thanks for your feedback,
just to clarify , you want to use specific unit for specific vpls instance ?
if you need specfic range of vlan per unit for multiple VPLS instance
,can you try the following below, this is not what we have in
production , but it should work, or work around it
set
7 matches
Mail list logo
