Hi Lukasz,
J-Series only needs a license to download signature updates for IDP - in order
to stop fragmentation, all you need to do is create a security policy that
matches on GRE traffic "match application junos-gre" and then references the
idp engine in the action "then permit application-ser
that only took...about 5 years ? sweet, juniperdude.
Chris Kawchuk [juniperd...@gmail.com] wrote:
> Just noticed this today - Seems JNPR has filled out the recommended release
> JunOS matrix for all the products now (incl M, T, MX, QFX)
>
> http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=
Hello Jonas,
You should use the new template for securing your router, use this
book.
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/community/junos/training-certification/day-one/fundamentals-series/securing-routing-engine/
Also when you finish always check all connections to RE with this
command:
show sy
Hi Daniel, just an update on this. The PR now has a workaround outlined and it
can be implemented via a script.
You mentioned our "beta" PR search, and we will be launching that officially
this week at http://prsearch.juniper.net. For this PR, customers with a valid
support contract can acce
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Stacy W. Smith wrote:
On Jan 30, 2012, at 1:05 AM, Per Granath wrote:
Im trying a basic filer to deny traffic to lo0.
SSH, OSPF and ICMP is allowed.
It doesnt work, it allows all traffic.
Same filter work on a ge-interface.
ge-1/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family inet
I am just curious what issues you guys are having with the junos releases? I am
currently not having issues with any of my Juniper kit. It would be interesting
to understand the use cases in which you are seeing issues.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 30, 2012, at 6:39 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On M
On Jan 30, 2012, at 1:05 AM, Per Granath wrote:
>> Im trying a basic filer to deny traffic to lo0.
>> SSH, OSPF and ICMP is allowed.
>>
>> It doesnt work, it allows all traffic.
>>
>> Same filter work on a ge-interface.
>>
>> ge-1/0/0 {
>> unit 0 {
>> family inet {
>> f
On Monday, January 30, 2012 07:31:39 PM Derick Winkworth
wrote:
> R9 will be good... we hope.
That's what we always say starting from R4, and yet here we
are... again :-).
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
__
10.4R9? This makes me very happy... I thought they were going to stop at R8.
I think they really need/want a golden release for the MX and R8 was supposed
to be it.
R9 will be good... we hope.
Derick Winkworth
CCIE #15672 (RS, SP), JNCIE-M #721
http://packetpushers.net/author/dwinkworth/
Hey Chris yeah, that just showed up about 2 weeks ago (at least that's
when I noticed it).
Since JTAC isn't supposed to provide you with recommended releases on
M/T/MX, at least this KB is a reference point... also nice to see them
update the MX recommended release ;)
Paul
-Original Mess
Just noticed this today - Seems JNPR has filled out the recommended release
JunOS matrix for all the products now (incl M, T, MX, QFX)
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB21476
- Chris.
... Riding the 10.4 MX Release Train. Next Stop, R9.
LinkedIn
Maurice Gil Cruz ha solicitado añadirte como contacto en LinkedIn:
--
Me gustaría añadirte a mi red profesional en LinkedIn.
Aceptar invitación de Maurice Gil Cruz
http://www.linkedin.com/e/u96119-gy18slbe-16/XqZSB0oknt5cTY
> Im trying a basic filer to deny traffic to lo0.
> SSH, OSPF and ICMP is allowed.
>
> It doesnt work, it allows all traffic.
>
> Same filter work on a ge-interface.
>
> ge-1/0/0 {
> unit 0 {
> family inet {
> filter {
> input admin-access;
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
