Hello,
Has anyone ever rack mounted an MX80 or a similar sized router at an angle
before? Any reason why this isn't a good idea? Could it have an impact on the
electrical components?
We've run into alot of COs where we could save money by installing them at an
angle. Existing racks aren't
How ever you mount it, you're going to not want to block the side
vents/fans or impede that airflow in any way. The MX80's run hot.
-b
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Serge Vautour sergevaut...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone ever rack mounted an MX80 or a similar sized router at an
I don't mean angled side-side, I mean angles front-back. So the back end would
be lower than the front end. After mounting, if you stood in front of the MX,
the front plate would be pointing towards the ceiling a bit instead of
horizontally.
Serge
From:
I would be careful the hot air exiting the rear is not sucked back in the
front, if the front is higher. Checkout link for airflow description.
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/reference/requirements/mx5-mx10-mx40-mx80-cabinet-requirements.html
On Feb 16,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Serge Vautour sergevaut...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone ever rack mounted an MX80 or a similar sized router at an angle
before? Any reason why this isn't a good idea? Could it have an impact on the
electrical components?
We've run into alot of COs
I haven't done this with an MX80, but over the years we have done this
with qutie a bit of equipment to keep within a telco style narrow bay
arrangement. We have never had any issue with doing it. I can't
imagine anything would be different for an MX80 as long as the airflow
remains intact.
On 2/16/2012 1:41 PM, Jerry Jones wrote:
I would be careful the hot air exiting the rear is not sucked back in the
front, if the front is higher. Checkout link for airflow description.
If I run 'show snmp mib walk jnxOperatingTemp' on an ex4200-24t I get valid
(i.e. non-zero) temperature readings for the FPCs and Routing Engines in it. If
I run the same command on an ex4500-40f all of the entries return a
non-operational status (i.e. zero). All of them are running 11.4R1.6.
Is mapping multiple forwarding classes per queue even possible on a J series?
forwarding-class class and restricted queue don't even seem to be avail in the
CLI but I
cannot find any docs that cover it one way or the other.
___
juniper-nsp mailing
9 matches
Mail list logo
