Re: [j-nsp] Decent J-Series software version

2012-02-29 Thread Timh Bergström
We are running 10.4r7.5 with security on dual stack with static routing, dhcp (IPv4) and RA (IPv6) for the office, it Works ok, but had to upgrade the ram and cf. We are running j2320. We also have one j2320 running on 10.4R8-something for our IX peerings, both v4/v6. I've disabled all security

[j-nsp] MX960: High CPU FPC

2012-02-29 Thread Evgeniy Aikashev
Good day, I have MX960 with 2 RE. Yesterday after switchover to backup RE (disk fail was the reason), I see high CPU utilization for fpc0 and fpc2 DPCE-R line cards. I changed the cards, sfps but it not help. Also I found out if I disable pics xe-2/0/0 and xe-2/1/0 the CPU utilization for fpc2

Re: [j-nsp] 100Base-LX10 and MX80

2012-02-29 Thread Brandon Ross
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, ?ukasz Dudzi?ski wrote: Do you have some experience with that type of SFP on MX80 platform ? If it is supported on MX80 (by 'supported' I mean - it's working, not that I can get support from JTAC in that type of SFP issues), what kind of SFP you have ? Original, Juniper

Re: [j-nsp] 100Base-LX10 and MX80

2012-02-29 Thread Łukasz Dudziński
W dniu 29.02.2012 14:26, Brandon Ross pisze: On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, �ukasz Dudzi�ski wrote: Do you have some experience with that type of SFP on MX80 platform ? If it is supported on MX80 (by 'supported' I mean - it's working, not that I can get support from JTAC in that type of SFP issues),

Re: [j-nsp] 100Base-LX10 and MX80

2012-02-29 Thread Brandon Ross
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, �~Aukasz Dudzi�~Dski wrote: I did it already. The topic you have mentioned does not cover the essence of my question. I've asked for that specific SFP (100Base-LX10), not for using third party optics at all. The problem is that I don't know if it is possible to use

Re: [j-nsp] MX960: High CPU FPC

2012-02-29 Thread Evgeniy Aikashev
Hi, Are you running any L2 services on these cards? Could it be a layer2 loop somewhere. No. Only ipv4 and v6 routing. A lot of bgp sessions Sure, it doesn't make too much sense to be triggered by a RE switchover Before a switchover, with RE0 as a primary, had no CPU problem.. I assume

Re: [j-nsp] MX960: High CPU FPC

2012-02-29 Thread Evgeniy Aikashev
Hello Tomas, what junos version are you running ? 10.0R4.7 sh sched Here threads looks a root of my issue. What does this means? Total uptime 0+06:38:59, (23939325 ms), 166489067 thread dispatches CPU load is 100% (5 second), 91% (1 minute) Total network interrupt time 0 (usec) CPU

[j-nsp] Logical systems on an M7i

2012-02-29 Thread Tom Storey
Hi everyone. Can anyone provide any pointers for the maximum number of logical systems one could expect to run on an M7i? As I understand it, each logical system has its own batch of processes running on the RE, so I am assuming the number is going to be some function of how much RAM you have on

Re: [j-nsp] IS-IS routes not installed

2012-02-29 Thread Paul Zugnoni
FWIW, check that you don't have igmp-snooping enabled on the EX for the VLANs where you have IS-IS traffic; it'll eat your Hello's. Having point-to-point configured can obfuscate the cause of your original problem. On Feb 24, 2012, at 13:55 , Kevin Wormington wrote: Thanks to all that replied.

Re: [j-nsp] IS-IS routes not installed

2012-02-29 Thread Kevin Wormington
Thanks for the heads up. igmp-snooping is not enabled on any VLANs on the EX. I think it didn't work without point-to-point because of having the two addresses configured on the same unit on one node. Just for kicks I reconfigured that to have two units using VLANs and it would work without

Re: [j-nsp] Logical systems on an M7i

2012-02-29 Thread Doug Hanks
15. Should be fine for personal use. It really just spawns another instance of rpd. Thank you, -- Doug Hanks - JNCIE-ENT #213, JNCIE-SP #875 Sr. Systems Engineer Juniper Networks On 2/29/12 9:51 AM, Tom Storey t...@snnap.net wrote: Hi everyone. Can anyone provide any pointers for the