On 03/20/2012 10:04 PM, Darren O'Connor wrote:
Hi all.
Does anyone know the oid value to get the current inet.0 and inet6.0 BGP
total values via SNMP?
Are you sure there is one?
There are per-peer per-AF prefix counters under the
jnxBgpM2PrefixCountersTable hierarchy, but the
Hi, Has anyone implemented RPM in juniper M/MX or J series routers ? I'm trying
to find a way to pollthe RPM probe results via SNMP. The problem is that, the
MIBs are proprietyto Juniper and the snmp mibwalk results doesn't correlate
probe-name if you have multiple probes.
tested in junos
Hi Phil.
Yes, as yet all I can find is a per-neighbour prefix count. Not a total
count. I guess I could get something to tally them all up and give the
total, but with peers being added all the time it's a bit of a headache.
Shame I can't just get the total value out.
Does anyone else use cacti
Darren O'Connor Darren.O'con...@hso.uk.com wrote:
Hi Phil.
Yes, as yet all I can find is a per-neighbour prefix count. Not a total
count. I guess I could get something to tally them all up and give the
total, but with peers being added all the time it's a bit of a
headache.
Shame I can't just
On a few occasions I've used those plastic washers you get with cage nut sets
between the post and the ear on the top holes, packing the top out a few
millimeters to take out some of the sag. It can be tricky to hold the washer
in place while putting the screw through.
You could also just put
Hi,
This functionality is indeed highly desirable for ISP.
AFAIK snmp traps might be used to signal a high level of DHCP pool utilization
on the BRAS.
Evgeny.
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net]
on behalf
Here is piece of perl script from my Cacti server that polls RPM data:
my $jnxRpmResCalcAverage = '.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.3.50.1.3.1.5';
my $jnxRpmResCalcPkToPk = '.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.3.50.1.3.1.6';
This should give you an idea. Probe name is most probably encoded in OID.
Nick
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at
This can happen if you are using policy-based IPSEC and if the outgoing
interface of RST packet is not included in encryption domain.
NK
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:01 AM, ashish verma ashish.s...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes it is reject.
Just found out that it is only over the IPSEC tunnel. Without
Thanks Nick, But the main problem is how to decode the probe name and each test
under the problem, as they are encoded..any ideas?
Cheers
From: Nick Kritsky nick.krit...@gmail.com
To: Shiva S Narayana sshankar...@yahoo.com
Cc: jpuck
I meant:
how to decode the probe name and each test under the probe, as they are
encoded
There must be a easy and scalable way to correlate the o/p for each probe and
subsequent test..
Cheers
From: Shiva S Narayana sshankar...@yahoo.com
To: Nick Kritsky
If it's in a 4 post rack, you can buy the 4 post kit.
EX-4PST-RMK
If not - you can turn the rack ears backwards, so the switch sits more centered
in the rack - although it will stick out further.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Williams [mailto:mike.willi...@comodo.com]
Sent:
What would be the issue in the second router which is not exporting
output
flows? Any bugs discovered so far?
I've got a couple of MX240s with MPC-1s running inline-jflow on 10.4R9 and
actually ran into PR737472. Sampling input and output on all but one transit
interface was working fine.
try the script i send to the cacti forums
http://forums.cacti.net/about32000.html
Nitzan
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 16:53, Shiva S Narayana sshankar...@yahoo.comwrote:
I meant:
how to decode the probe name and each test under the probe, as they are
encoded
There must be a easy and scalable
13 matches
Mail list logo
