Re: [j-nsp] Help Needed for Bonjour Routing/OSX Clients

On 5/10/12 16:21 , Phil Mayers wrote: > On 10/05/12 17:12, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Phil Mayers > > wrote: >> >> On 09/05/12 22:55, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: >> >> I've gotten this to work in the past, but it ended up bein

Re: [j-nsp] Help Needed for Bonjour Routing/OSX Clients

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Joel jaeggli wrote: > On 5/10/12 16:21 , Phil Mayers wrote: > > On 10/05/12 17:12, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: > >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Phil Mayers >> > wrote: > >> > >> On 09/05/12 22:55, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: > >>

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper SFP's

my SE in our local US office told me that juniper do this to "claw back R&D costs". Now that may be hearsay but it certainly makes sense on how they position their different SFP's and prices. I was a Juniper advocate back in the late 90's up until mid naughties, but now they are losing the plot. It

Re: [j-nsp] Document Update - EX Features

I kind of agree with the OP on this one. As customers it wasn't our choice to include a "re-branded" switch in the portfolio. It's simpler to be able to get all the info in one spot, especially if all the other switches in the family are listed there. Just my $0.02. 2012/5/10 Aviva Garrett >

Re: [j-nsp] Default route in OSPF NSSA

Perhaps at the time, the node did not have an area 0 adjacency. With active-backbone detection as a default (can be disabled), such a node won't generate a default. Regards -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On B

Re: [j-nsp] Controlling routes between OSPF areas

Hi, If you want to summarize from area 0 to area 1 you should put the 'area-range' in area 0. Did you try that? Don't forget the restrict to filter the route. HTH Ivan, On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Morgan McLean wrote: > Also, just to add to this, if I try to deny a route by neighbor or >

Re: [j-nsp] Default route in OSPF NSSA

Well I'm almost certain I had tried that and it had just stopped advertising a default all together. It's working now: nssa {     default-lsa default-metric 1;     no-summaries; } Thanks,Serge From: Harry Reynolds To: Serge Vautour ; "juniper-nsp@puck.nether.

Re: [j-nsp] M-VPN for IPv6

Yes. Juniper has supported BGP-signalled multicast MPLS VPNs (aka NG-MVPN) for IPv6 since 10.0. Only real extra requirement is: {master}[edit protocols bgp group ibgp] regress@aslan# set family inet6-mvpn in the core, and configuring normal IPv6 unicast/multicast routing in the routing-instan

Re: [j-nsp] Help Needed for Bonjour Routing/OSX Clients

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 10/05/12 17:12, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: > >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Phil Mayers > > wrote: >> >>On 09/05/12 22:55, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: >> >>I've gotten this to work in the past, bu

Re: [j-nsp] Help Needed for Bonjour Routing/OSX Clients

On 10/05/12 17:12, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Phil Mayers mailto:p.may...@imperial.ac.uk>> wrote: On 09/05/12 22:55, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: I've gotten this to work in the past, but it ended up being a LOT more work than just using DNS

Re: [j-nsp] Default route in OSPF NSSA

IIRC, the juni will send a type 3 network summary if you remove the type-7 statement, which is forcing it to generate a NSSA type 7 external for the default. HTHs -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of S

Re: [j-nsp] Document Update - EX Features

Hi Skeeve, Here is the reason it's not included: the EX2500 does not run Junos software. I see that the doc web pages are not clear about this, and I am following up with the PLM and writing teams to see what we might want to do about this. Aviva In message <20120507182021.cff8111...@eng-mail01.

Re: [j-nsp] Help Needed for Bonjour Routing/OSX Clients

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 09/05/12 22:55, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: > > I've gotten this to work in the past, but it ended up being a LOT more >> work >> than just using DNS names and routing (which I've subsequently done each >> time). >> > > Out of curiosity, how di

[j-nsp] Default route in OSPF NSSA

Hello, I've used the following config on an MX960 to generate a default route into an OSPF NSSA area: area 0.0.1.2 {     nssa {     default-lsa {     default-metric 1;     type-7;     }     no-summaries;     } } It works but the default route shows up as an N1 type r

Re: [j-nsp] Update on 10.4R9 stability for MX?

We've started to implement 10.4R9 in Prod. A few MX960s with MPC & DPC mix and MX80s have been upgraded without a problem (knock on wood!). We use L2VPN & VPLS with OSPF/LDP/BGP. Serge From: Clarke Morledge To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Wednesday,

[j-nsp] M-VPN for IPv6

Dear Juniper Expert, I would like to ask if there are any draft/actual implementation for Multicast IPv6 support on MPLS VPN network. I've been trying to find resource/reference for this subject and i would like to deploy this feature if it already exist. Thanks _

Re: [j-nsp] Help Needed for Bonjour Routing/OSX Clients

On 09/05/12 22:55, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: I've gotten this to work in the past, but it ended up being a LOT more work than just using DNS names and routing (which I've subsequently done each time). Out of curiosity, how did this work? Isn't most mDNS traffic TTL=1? ___

Re: [j-nsp] Update on 10.4R9 stability for MX?

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Clarke Morledge wrote: > I am curious to know about anyone's experience with 10.4R9 over the past few > months.  I have DPC only currently; i.e. no MPC hardware -- and no > MultiServices. I've been hit by: PR570168 - RE crash triggered by deletion and recreation of

Re: [j-nsp] problems with srx240

Le 05/05/2012 12:38, Maciej Jan Broniarz a écrit : Hi, My SRX240 box started showing the following error in the logs: May 5 00:36:08 srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 00: sp = 0x49202a58, pc = 0x08020254 May 5 00:36:08 srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 01: sp = 0x49202b00, pc = 0x0800c1fc May 5 00:3

Re: [j-nsp] Controlling routes between OSPF areas

Also, just to add to this, if I try to deny a route by neighbor or next-hop, the entire route is denied regardless of where it comes from. If I try to deny the export of a route from protocol static on the announcing router, again it doesn't matter to which neighbor, it denies the entire route. A

Re: [j-nsp] SRX3600 and NAT

Le 27/04/2012 12:14, Tomas Lynch a écrit : I'm looking for some info on SRX3600: Hi, for docs on juniper products : https://www.juniper.net/techpubs/ How many static and dynamic NATs are supported per box and per virtual router on a SRX3600? supported means configured or available in the sess

Re: [j-nsp] Update on 10.4R9 stability for MX?

Hi, On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > There is a serious issue with MPLS RSVP auto-bandwidth in 10.4R9, which > can cause the reservation calculations to be off by quite a bit. The > least broken code we've found so far is 10.4S9, I'm surprised they > haven't done a