On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:19:26PM +0400, Nick Kritsky wrote:
As per original question, Juniper states pretty clearly:
If you ignore the warning and
commit such a configuration, the configuration succeeds but you run
the risk of crashing
the Ethernet switching process (eswd) due to memory
On 01/05/12 13:15, Naveen Nathan wrote:
I'm attempting to retire a cisco 6509 setup, replacing it with an EX4200
virtual chassis configuration (8 linecards). I've run into a warning
when committing the configuration:
warning: Exceeded vmember threshold limit, it is recommended to
have not
Hi Expert,
We are planning to deploy MX in our all Cisco network. However, my tech team
are not comfortable with mismatch LSA timer which MX unable to configure
certain parameter.
At the moment we are using the following setting on Cisco.
timers throttle spf 50 50 5000
timers throttle lsa
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 12:19:19 PM Wan Tajuddin Wan Hussin
wrote:
Has anyone deploy this type of setting and successfully
integrate with Juniper without any issue.
You'll quickly notice that many configurable timers in Cisco
are not available in Junos. However, this isn't a train-
wreck,
Hello all,
According to the installation guide, the Standalone 7.4.0 SBR Carrier Server
has 2 GB RAM Minimum Configuration.
Can it be successfully installed/run at a Solaris with 1 GB RAM? This would
a lab server, only to verify that it works.
(also asked @ j-net, but just to have a second
Or just use BFD ...
Thank you,
--
Doug Hanks - JNCIE-ENT #213, JNCIE-SP #875
Sr. Systems Engineer
Juniper Networks
On 5/29/12 4:54 AM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 12:19:19 PM Wan Tajuddin Wan Hussin
wrote:
Has anyone deploy this type of setting and
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 04:08:40 PM Doug Hanks wrote:
Or just use BFD ...
Might not always be available on the other side of the link
:-).
Mark.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 07:41:37 PM Doug Hanks wrote:
Should be an architectural requirement imho :D
The reality is always different, as you know :-).
The situation is compounded when kit is older and can't be
easily replaced, for various reasons; or is off the
development cycle, e.g., the
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Wan Tajuddin Wan Hussin eazy_...@yahoo.com
wrote:
We are planning to deploy MX in our all Cisco network. However, my tech
team are not comfortable with mismatch LSA timer which MX unable to
configure certain parameter.
At the moment we are using the
On (2012-05-29 07:08 -0700), Doug Hanks wrote:
Or just use BFD ...
Not really solution for SPF timers though. Juniper is clearly lacking in
SPF configuration options. What you operationally want is 0 delay for SPF
calculation to start, to cover typical event of single link going down as
rapidly
All-
JUNOS has a few config options and we have interop'd in the field for sometime
with Cisco's IGP FC config's:
SPF IW value defaults:
IOS-XR default: IW: 50ms, 2ndaryW: 200ms, MaxW: 5000ms
JUNOS defaults: IW: 200ms, MaxW: 5000ms, RRs: 3
The Cisco alg. is an exponentially increasing
Nmci. 45 ic6500s and 40 sa6/6500s.
On May 29, 2012, at 5:20 PM, Dan Chevrie uk2...@gmail.com wrote:
Experts,
Am looking for SSL and UAC deployment document in data center environment.
Please share, if you have any document/reference guide available.
-Dan
12 matches
Mail list logo
