[j-nsp] reth physical link not enabled

2012-06-11 Thread roland DROUAL
Hello the List, I have a problem with an redundant interface reth2. I think the configuration is right, but I can't ping the @ IP The physical link is up, but the redundant interface is not enabled. How can I do, to have the reth2 physical link enabled ? Thanks for your help. Roland DROUAL

Re: [j-nsp] reth physical link not enabled

2012-06-11 Thread roland DROUAL
I want to add: The interface reth2 is connected to an interface ge-0/0/21 on a switch EX4200. The interface is in trunk mode. (it's the same if the interface is in access mode). This interface ge-0/0/21 is UP. Thanks for your help Roland DROUAL titi@AS-EX4200-01# show interfaces ge-0/0/21

Re: [j-nsp] reth physical link not enabled

2012-06-11 Thread Ben Boyd
Did you create the reth interface with: set chassis cluster reth-count 3 The reth-count needs to be at least 3 since numbering starts at 0. Thanks, Ben Boyd -- Sent from my iPhone 4s On Jun 11, 2012, at 5:49, roland DROUAL roland.dro...@paris.iufm.fr wrote: Hello the

Re: [j-nsp] reth physical link not enabled

2012-06-11 Thread Clay Haynes
On 6/11/12 5:49 AM, roland DROUAL roland.dro...@paris.iufm.fr wrote: Hello the List, I have a problem with an redundant interface reth2. I think the configuration is right, but I can't ping the @ IP The physical link is up, but the redundant interface is not enabled. How can I do, to have the

Re: [j-nsp] reth physical link not enabled

2012-06-11 Thread roland DROUAL
Thank you. I typed: set chassis cluster reth-count 5 and my config is right now. I lost my chassis-cluster 2 weeks ago with 5 reth, and I don't know why the new config was with reth-count = 2 It's OK now, Thank you Roland DROUAL Le 11/06/2012 14:08, Clay Haynes a écrit : Can you run a

[j-nsp] Problem to ping a node on internet

2012-06-11 Thread roland DROUAL
Hello the List, I have a problem to ping a node on internet. From INSIDE network, I can ping a node on DMZ network. From DMZ network, I can ping a node on INSIDE network From the SRX650 , I can ping a node on INSIDE network, and a node on DMZ network. From the SRX650 , I can ping

[j-nsp] {Disarmed} Re: Problem to ping a node on internet

2012-06-11 Thread Roland Droual
oh ! I'm very tired. You are in right. I forgot the source nat rules, for my inside IPs @ (private @) I will config them tomorrow morning. But I can't understand why , from a node on the DMZ (193.48.41.194, a public @) I can't ping a node on internet. In fact, in a first time, I began to

[j-nsp] Firewall best practices

2012-06-11 Thread Morgan McLean
Hi everyone, I have a question regarding managing policies among multiple sets of firewalls. I don't know what industry standard / best practice is for managing rules among multiple devices. Currently our office has an srx cluster, site A has an edge srx cluster and core srx cluster, and site B

Re: [j-nsp] Firewall best practices

2012-06-11 Thread Patrick Dickey
Morgan- I would take a good hard look at Junos Space's Security Design package. Its has centralized address books, tier'd policy management, config management, and VPN tools (among a ton of other features), all from a single pane of glass. Ask your reseller for a demo or check it out online.

Re: [j-nsp] Firewall best practices

2012-06-11 Thread Ben Dale
Hi Morgan, I have a question regarding managing policies among multiple sets of firewalls. I don't know what industry standard / best practice is for managing rules among multiple devices. If there is an industry standard, no one in any industry I've worked with is aware of it ; ) I don't

Re: [j-nsp] Firewall best practices

2012-06-11 Thread Tim Eberhard
While I agree space is a decent viable option there are lots of limitations and caveats around the Space security designer product. Test it throughly before buying and know how it acts and what it does that will not work in your environment. Another thing worth mentioning is SD has been out less

Re: [j-nsp] Firewall best practices

2012-06-11 Thread Tim Eberhard
Ben, let me introduce you to my little friend called the global address book. Introduced in 11.4. set security address-book global address p1 192.168.1.13/32 -Tim Eberhard On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Ben Dale bd...@comlinx.com.au wrote: What would really help though is if Junos allowed

Re: [j-nsp] Firewall best practices

2012-06-11 Thread Ben Dale
Nice - Thanks Tim! The 11.4 release note for this feature and what it means doesn't read half as well as they should ; ) Now if only there was a release of 11.4 for SRX that didn't make baby kittens cry! On 12/06/2012, at 10:08 AM, Tim Eberhard wrote: Ben, let me introduce you to my

Re: [j-nsp] Firewall best practices

2012-06-11 Thread Wayne Tucker
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Ben Dale bd...@comlinx.com.au wrote: What would really help though is if Junos allowed multiple address-books to be bound to a single zone - that way, SRXs buried deeper in your network would have access to all address-book entries on a single upstream zone

Re: [j-nsp] Firewall best practices

2012-06-11 Thread Ben Dale
Hi Wayne, Thanks for this - that's actually a really good solution I hadn't even considered - I can take it a step further and use wildcards on the zone to solve my multiple address-book on a single zone request: set groups HQ-UNTRUST-HOSTS security zones security-zone * address-book address

Re: [j-nsp] Firewall best practices

2012-06-11 Thread Brent Jones
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Ben Dale bd...@comlinx.com.au wrote: Hi Wayne, Thanks for this - that's actually a really good solution I hadn't even considered - I can take it a step further and use wildcards on the zone to solve my multiple address-book on a single zone request: set