Thank you much Siva,
That does explain the missing bridge option. A lot of the documentation I
looked at included the bridge option in the 'forwarding-options
port-mirroring' section, but I am using the vpls option with no success.
I didn't post the mirror interface information as I had nothing c
Hi All,
I'm trying to filter some inter-area OSPF routes from being installed into the
route table on a few routers.
I seem to remember that in Junos it isn't possible to filter inter-area routes
with an import policy - only externals.
However I do also remember a rumour that this feature would
Hi,
as per the Juniper documentation,
*Note: *Under the [edit forwarding-options port-mirroring instance *
pm-instance-name*] hierarchy level, the protocol family statement family
bridge is an alias for family vpls. The CLI displays Layer 2 port-mirroring
configurations as family vpls, even for L
Greetings All,
I am trying to get a port mirror working with no success. I want to
port-mirror ge-1/0/0 interfaces that is interface-type access.
When I configure the forwarding-options, there is no longer a bridge
option.only ccc, inet and vpls. Even though not showing, when I configure
'
I'd also recommend the great Junos Day One books on QoS:
http://www.juniper.net/au/en/community/junos/training-certification/day-one/fundamentals-series/deploying-basic-qos/
http://www.juniper.net/au/en/community/junos/training-certification/day-one/fundamentals-series/junos-qos/
The Junos QoS fo
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 03:43:04PM -0500, Paul Stewart wrote:
> Thanks RAS.. that's interesting as we've never actually tried that...
>
> Have you tried this in a production environment or would you? Do we
> have any idea on whether or not JTAC would support this configuration
> officially?
>
Thanks RAS.. that's interesting as we've never actually tried that...
Have you tried this in a production environment or would you? Do we have
any idea on whether or not JTAC would support this configuration officially?
I realize these are loaded questions - just really curious on this topic as
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 12:39:05PM -0600, Jose Sanchez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anybody know if the RE Redundancy in Juniper MX Routers requires that
> both RE are the same hardware or it is enough that the REs has the same
> JUNOS Version?
As long as they're reasonably similar it should work fin
My .02.
I too cannot find documentation that mandates the same RE hardware or Junos SW
for all HA features. The 12.2 HA guide does mandate the same version for NSR,
and my extension ISSU. (page 80):
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.2/information-products/topic-collections/config-gu
Nothing that I have handy - sorry. we asked this question a few times to our
Juniper SE and were told that (so presumed it to be factual)
J
From: Jose Sanchez [mailto:jasjuni...@gmail.com]
Sent: January-09-13 1:49 PM
To: Paul Stewart
Cc: juniper-nsp
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Question about Rout
Thank you,
Any link to the documentation that require this?
Thanks again
Jose
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
> Both same hardware
>
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Both same hardware
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jose Sanchez
Sent: January-09-13 1:39 PM
To: juniper-nsp
Subject: [j-nsp] Question about Routing Engine Redundancy on MX
Hello,
Does anybody know
Hello,
Does anybody know if the RE Redundancy in Juniper MX Routers requires that
both RE are the same hardware or it is enough that the REs has the same
JUNOS Version?
Thanks
Jose
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.n
13 matches
Mail list logo
