[j-nsp] equivalent of transparent-as

2013-03-01 Thread Suginto Hung
Dear all, In quangga, there is transparent-as to hide our own ASN. Is there any similar function in Juniper? Thank you, br Suginto ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] equivalent of transparent-as

2013-03-01 Thread Per Granath
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos/topics/example/bgp-local-as-private.html -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Suginto Hung Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 10:38 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

[j-nsp] EX VC mixed mode experience

2013-03-01 Thread Riccardo S
I'm wondering if anybody have info or experience in a scenario with mixed virtual-chassis (6 equipments between 4500 and 4200) with high density (more or less 70) of 10GBs ports. Since these architecture should be placed in a very sensitive position (servers and storage managing online

Re: [j-nsp] SRX240 Series and BGP Routes (and other things)

2013-03-01 Thread Eugeniu Patrascu
I guess it has to do with the EOL announcement for the J series where the SRX is promoted as the successor platform. For full tables, the J series were the smallest Juniper routers that you could buy and with 2GB of RAM they work very well. I'm sad to see them gone.

Re: [j-nsp] EX VC mixed mode experience

2013-03-01 Thread Jeff Wheeler
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Riccardo S dim0...@hotmail.com wrote: I'm wondering if anybody have info or experience in a scenario with mixed virtual-chassis (6 equipments between 4500 and 4200) with high density (more or less 70) of 10GBs ports. Since these architecture should be

Re: [j-nsp] EX VC mixed mode experience

2013-03-01 Thread Amos Rosenboim
We have deployed a mixed mode 4500/4200 small VC as a part of mobile network core and it is running smoothly so far. We don't have significant throughput, and we don't run any fancy features. It's simply serves as L2 port extension for MX routers. We have also tried to deploy mixed mode between

[j-nsp] SRX AV cloud vs on-device

2013-03-01 Thread Andy Litzinger
Hi all, we're looking at an SRX 550 and have been posed with the choice between using the cloud based anti-virus or the on-device. Are there any compelling reasons to pick one over the other? thanks! -andy ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

Re: [j-nsp] Krt queue high priority

2013-03-01 Thread Doug Hanks
# set policy-options policy-statement test term 1 then priority ? Possible completions: high Set priority to high low Set priority to low medium Set priority to medium On 2/24/13 1:06 AM, Darren O'Connor darre...@outlook.com wrote: Hi all.

[j-nsp] Lab gear to mimic MX80?

2013-03-01 Thread Morgan McLean
Hey everyone, I'd like to pick up a few pieces of gear to simulate our MX80's in production. We wouldn't necessarily need the same amount of memory, throughput etc just feature set and general config. I've been using SRX220's for everything up to now, but thats not always accurate to what I'd

Re: [j-nsp] Lab gear to mimic MX80?

2013-03-01 Thread Alex Arseniev
ACX would do better, it uses same JUNOS build (for PowerPC) as MX80. Thanks Alex - Original Message - From: Morgan McLean wrx...@gmail.com To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 11:12 PM Subject: [j-nsp] Lab gear to mimic MX80? Hey everyone, I'd like to pick