Dear all,
In quangga, there is transparent-as to hide our own ASN.
Is there any similar function in Juniper?
Thank you,
br
Suginto
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos/topics/example/bgp-local-as-private.html
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Suginto Hung
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 10:38 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
I'm wondering if anybody have info or experience in a scenario
with mixed virtual-chassis (6 equipments between 4500 and 4200) with high
density
(more or less 70) of 10GBs ports.
Since these architecture should be placed in a
very sensitive position (servers and storage managing online
I guess it has to do with the EOL announcement for the J series where the
SRX is promoted as the successor platform.
For full tables, the J series were the smallest Juniper routers that you
could buy and with 2GB of RAM they work very well.
I'm sad to see them gone.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Riccardo S dim0...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'm wondering if anybody have info or experience in a scenario
with mixed virtual-chassis (6 equipments between 4500 and 4200) with high
density
(more or less 70) of 10GBs ports.
Since these architecture should be
We have deployed a mixed mode 4500/4200 small VC as a part of mobile network
core and it is running smoothly so far.
We don't have significant throughput, and we don't run any fancy features.
It's simply serves as L2 port extension for MX routers.
We have also tried to deploy mixed mode between
Hi all,
we're looking at an SRX 550 and have been posed with the choice between using
the cloud based anti-virus or the on-device. Are there any compelling
reasons to pick one over the other?
thanks!
-andy
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
# set policy-options policy-statement test term 1 then priority ?
Possible completions:
high Set priority to high
low Set priority to low
medium Set priority to medium
On 2/24/13 1:06 AM, Darren O'Connor darre...@outlook.com wrote:
Hi all.
Hey everyone,
I'd like to pick up a few pieces of gear to simulate our MX80's in
production. We wouldn't necessarily need the same amount of memory,
throughput etc just feature set and general config.
I've been using SRX220's for everything up to now, but thats not always
accurate to what I'd
ACX would do better, it uses same JUNOS build (for PowerPC) as MX80.
Thanks
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Morgan McLean wrx...@gmail.com
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 11:12 PM
Subject: [j-nsp] Lab gear to mimic MX80?
Hey everyone,
I'd like to pick
10 matches
Mail list logo