Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread Bjørn Tore
Is this an Bjørn Tore @ mobil Den 13. mars 2013 kl. 23:40 skrev snort bsd snort...@yahoo.com.au: hi all: i have a cisco 3750 fastethernet switch connecting to a juniper 4200, with portchannel on cisco side and aggregated interface juniper side. the cisco side shows as connected but

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread Bjørn Tore
Might it be that the EX can't link to FE, but only to GE? I know the -F only takes gig, unless you use a certain SFP. Bjørn Tore @ mobil Den 13. mars 2013 kl. 23:40 skrev snort bsd snort...@yahoo.com.au: hi all: i have a cisco 3750 fastethernet switch connecting to a juniper 4200, with

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread Mark Menzies
We had issues before with LAGs between cisco and SRX. The links were showing as up and then intermittently went down. We fixed it by setting the LACP periodic interval to slow and it corrected it all. Seems that cisco defaults to slow and Juniper to fast. Just a mismatch in LACP packets. HTH

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread snort bsd
well, both ends are copper links, but links on 3750 are f10/100 and that of juniper are 10/100/1000. _dave From: Jonathan Lassoff j...@thejof.com To: snort bsd snort...@yahoo.com.au Cc: juniper-nsp juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Wednesday, 13 March 2013

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread snort bsd
well, i deliberately not to activate lacp at this moment. just want to see physical links up... _dave From: Eric Krichbaum e...@telic.us To: 'Jonathan Lassoff' j...@thejof.com; 'snort bsd' snort...@yahoo.com.au Cc: 'juniper-nsp' juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread Eric Krichbaum
That's correct but in this case one is LACP (802.3ad) and one is not so it won't bring up the links at all. Eric From: snort bsd [mailto:snort...@yahoo.com.au] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 9:17 AM To: Jonathan Lassoff; Eric Krichbaum Cc: juniper-nsp Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread Eric Krichbaum
Then you'll have to take them out of the LAG and just have them be normal ports. Just stick them in an unused vlan for safety and you should be able to get link. When you're ready to LAG them back use mode active on the cisco side to the 802.3ad on the Juniper. Eric From: snort bsd

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread Bill Blackford
I missed paret of this thread, so if this was suggested prior, my apologies. On you AE bundle, I believe you need to explicitly define LACP: ae1 { aggregated-ether-options { lacp { active; } -Bill From: snort bsd

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread Payam Chychi
Ive seen this happen with bad sfp as well as not setting mode to active Try setting up a simple ptp to remove portchan setting out of the equation, if that works and shows up/up on both ends, try setting to mode active on the portchan settings If ur ptp doesn't work... Try diff port,

[j-nsp] Hashing on M10i LAG interfaces

2013-03-14 Thread Chris Adams
I'm probably missing an obvious search term, but I didn't find this myself, so asking... How does an M10i hash packets to choose a link on a LAG interface? Is it configurable? This is on a PE-4FE-TX if it matters. I found a document that says EX switches used a fixed (non-configurable) hash

Re: [j-nsp] Hashing on M10i LAG interfaces

2013-03-14 Thread joel jaeggli
On 3/14/13 1:33 PM, Chris Adams wrote: I'm probably missing an obvious search term, but I didn't find this myself, so asking... How does an M10i hash packets to choose a link on a LAG interface? Is it configurable? This is on a PE-4FE-TX if it matters.

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread snort bsd
thanks all for replies. both ends (physical are up now, with no lacp. as simple as just rebooted cisco switch. really lacp isn't my concern at this moment. From: snort bsd snort...@yahoo.com.au To: Jonathan Lassoff j...@thejof.com; Eric Krichbaum