Re: [j-nsp] Different media in an AE cause framing issues?

2013-04-02 Thread Phil Mayers
On 04/01/2013 08:52 PM, Morgan McLean wrote: So at this point I'm wondering if mixing the fiber and DAC connections is a nono? Due to timing issues? Not sure how that would screw up the frame, but maybe somebody has more insight. That seems like a really complicated explanation; why would you

[j-nsp] MX - Input packet rejects

2013-04-02 Thread Sebastian Wiesinger
Hello, I'm a bit puzzled by the 'Input packet rejects' counter shown by 'show interface .. extensive'. What exactly does that counter count? I have this output: Filter statistics: Input packet count38435461 Input packet rejects 23759 Input DA

Re: [j-nsp] Different media in an AE cause framing issues?

2013-04-02 Thread Ben Boyd
On Apr 1, 2013, at 15:52, Morgan McLean wrx...@gmail.com wrote: Hey guys... So I just bought a bunch of avago SFP+'s from a local distributor, about 250 of them, so I'm in relatively deep here. I'm wondering if I just made a general mistake by adding another 20gbit of MM OM3 with these

Re: [j-nsp] EX Switch Question

2013-04-02 Thread Pavel Lunin
I couldn't agree more. Funnily enough when I saw the EX2200C-12 get released being both fanless and shallow depth the first use case I thought was ME NTU/Small PoP. Front-mounted power would have been nice, but hey, I'll deal. There are enough dot1q-tunnelling knobs built-in* for most

[j-nsp] Clustering J-series across a switch

2013-04-02 Thread Mike Williams
Hey all, So I've been reading the clustering docs, and they make it pretty clear that the (at least) control link should connect the devices back-to-back. I don't have the page to hand but there is an option to configure the control link in the old way, using (a?) VLAN (4094 IIRC), otherwise

Re: [j-nsp] Clustering J-series across a switch

2013-04-02 Thread Aaron Dewell
IIRC, it's possible but not recommended due to the reliability issue of the switch in between. In your situation, I'd probably give it a shot. Definitely use different VLANs for control and fabric. Aaron On Apr 2, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Mike Williams wrote: Hey all, So I've been reading the

Re: [j-nsp] Clustering J-series across a switch

2013-04-02 Thread Pavel Lunin
02.04.2013 20:47, Mike Williams wrote: I don't have the page to hand but there is an option to configure the control link in the old way, using (a?) VLAN (4094 IIRC), otherwise new clusters will use a special ether-type. Yes, as already mentioned its revertible with set chassis cluster

Re: [j-nsp] Different media in an AE cause framing issues?

2013-04-02 Thread Morgan McLean
Phil, I can't imagine that BOTH connections I added to the AE are bad, whether it be SFP related or Fiber related. And I'm using the same fiber and SFP's out to the cabinets (with no issues as of yet), which leaves me with the DAC + SFP on an AE is a bad idea. Ben, Ya I'm thinking thats my next

Re: [j-nsp] Clustering J-series across a switch

2013-04-02 Thread OBrien, Will
I've heard that it works. I have avoided it so far, however. Will O'Brien On Apr 2, 2013, at 11:48 AM, Mike Williams mike.willi...@comodo.com wrote: Hey all, So I've been reading the clustering docs, and they make it pretty clear that the (at least) control link should connect the devices

Re: [j-nsp] Clustering J-series across a switch

2013-04-02 Thread Mark Menzies
It works on 11.4 (several versions) with running dual control and dual fabric links between 2 SRX3600 using cisco VSS switches in between. As long as control and data planes have different VLANs and you enable jumbo frames on the fabric it just works. Not tried to Q in Q the traffic though, just