[j-nsp] Destination NAT

2013-11-28 Thread Mohammad Khalil
Hi All I have srx210h I Have a server with an IP address x.x.x.x and want to allow telnet access to it on different port (I chose ) , and assigned it the public IP address y.y.y.y But seems not working set security zones security-zone trust address-book address SERVER y.y.y.y/32 set

Re: [j-nsp] Destination NAT

2013-11-28 Thread Asad Raza
Hi, DNAT is done before the policy match/route lookup. You need to allow x.x.x.x in the policy instead of y.y.y.y Regards, Asad On Nov 28, 2013, at 11:00 AM, Mohammad Khalil eng.m...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All I have srx210h I Have a server with an IP address x.x.x.x and want to allow telnet

Re: [j-nsp] Destination NAT

2013-11-28 Thread Mohammad Khalil
But I already configured set security zones security-zone trust address-book address SERVER y.y.y.y/32 Which will contain the real IP address right ? I followed the link below http://www.fir3net.com/Juniper-SRX-Series-Gateway/juniper-srx-destination-nat-port-forwarding.html On Thu, Nov 28, 2013

Re: [j-nsp] Destination NAT

2013-11-28 Thread Asad Raza
Again, Your config says that x.x.x.x is the physical IP address of the server and y.y.y.y is the NAT pool IP. So, in the security policy, you will allow the physical IP address (x.x.x.x) in the destination address INSTEAD of y.y.y.y. it should be like following: set security zones

Re: [j-nsp] Destination NAT

2013-11-28 Thread Asad Raza
Actually your NAT pool config need changes as well. Following is the correct config with changes highlighted: Assumption: Real (private) IP of server: x.x.x.x:23 Public (NAT) IP of server : y.y.y.y: set security zones security-zone trust address-book address SERVER x.x.x.x/32 set

Re: [j-nsp] Destination NAT

2013-11-28 Thread Per Westerlund
I am sorry to say that I think it is almost correct. The policy rules are evaluated after destination NAT handling, where the destination port has already been translated. You should probably exchange: set security policies from-zone untrust to-zone trust policy DNAT_POLICY match application

Re: [j-nsp] Destination NAT

2013-11-28 Thread Mohammad Khalil
set security policies from-zone untrust to-zone trust policy DNAT_POLICY match application junos-telnet But am already using right ? and junos-telnet is supposed to work in 23 ? On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Mohammad Khalil eng.m...@gmail.comwrote: Sorry but it did not work again

Re: [j-nsp] Destination NAT

2013-11-28 Thread Mohammad Khalil
Sorry but it did not work again set security zones security-zone trust address-book address ALTOS_SERVER 132.147.160.3/32 set applications application TELNET_DNAT protocol tcp set applications application TELNET_DNAT destination-port set security nat destination pool DNAT_POOL address

Re: [j-nsp] Destination NAT

2013-11-28 Thread Per Westerlund
Below is what I believe is a working solution. First, with destination nat, matching on public IP/port, the destination IP/port is translated from 24.173.164.162 : to 132.147.160.3:23. Next, the policy match statement has to allow just that, after the translation: 132.147.160.3:23.

Re: [j-nsp] Destination NAT

2013-11-28 Thread Per Westerlund
Have you set up proxy-arp for the DNAT address? It does not work by itself, has to be manually if it is an address on the external (untrust) network. /Per 28 nov 2013 kl. 10:32 skrev Mohammad Khalil eng.m...@gmail.com: set security policies from-zone untrust to-zone trust policy

Re: [j-nsp] Destination NAT

2013-11-28 Thread Per Westerlund
No, those source nat rules should have no effect on you problem. When the inbound traffic matches (hopefully) the requirements, a complete flow is set up. The return traffic automatically gets the proper nat handling to match the inbound traffic. The outbound traffic will use source NAT that

Re: [j-nsp] Destination NAT

2013-11-28 Thread Mohammad Khalil
Yes , it's in place with no luck set security nat source rule-set trust-to-untrust from zone trust set security nat source rule-set trust-to-untrust to zone untrust set security nat source rule-set trust-to-untrust rule nonat match source-address 132.147.160.0/24 set security nat source rule-set

Re: [j-nsp] Destination NAT

2013-11-28 Thread Mohammad Khalil
No the session is not up , and I have changed the port to be 23 on both sides (junos-telnet) and still not working ? On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Per Westerlund p...@westerlund.se wrote: No, those source nat rules should have no effect on you problem. When the inbound traffic matches

Re: [j-nsp] Destination NAT

2013-11-28 Thread Mohammad Khalil
set security nat proxy-arp interface ge-0/0/0.0 address 24.173.164.162/32 ? On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Per Westerlund p...@westerlund.se wrote: Have you set up proxy-arp for the DNAT address? It does not work by itself, has to be manually if it is an address on the external (untrust)

Re: [j-nsp] Destination NAT

2013-11-28 Thread Per Westerlund
Try to add this to your configuration: [edit security flow] perw@srx1# show traceoptions { file dnat-telnet-debug; flag basic-datapath; packet-filter dnat-telnet-in { protocol tcp; destination-prefix 24.173.164.162/32; destination-port ; }

Re: [j-nsp] Destination NAT

2013-11-28 Thread Mohammad Khalil
Ok i will give it a shot , but before that I have tried something different , I just want to configure static NAT (one to one) set security nat static rule-set static-nat from zone untrust set security nat static rule-set static-nat rule ALTOS_STATIC match destination-address 24.173.164.162/32 set

[j-nsp] Fwd: Destination NAT

2013-11-28 Thread Per Westerlund
Problem resolved. /Per Vidarebefordrat brev: Från: Mohammad Khalil eng.m...@gmail.com Ämne: Re: [j-nsp] Destination NAT Datum: 28 november 2013 12:23:49 CET Till: Per Westerlund p...@westerlund.se All the problem was from the public IP address , seems it was used somewhere else I do

Re: [j-nsp] Destination NAT

2013-11-28 Thread Mohammad Khalil
Ok I have changed the static IP address to 164 and the static NAT worked , I will try the destination port again On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Mohammad Khalil eng.m...@gmail.com wrote: Ok i will give it a shot , but before that I have tried something different , I just want to configure

Re: [j-nsp] Destination NAT

2013-11-28 Thread Payam Chychi
Is the dst ip pingabl drom the fw? I thought the system auto monitors to see if the dnat dst responds to icmp packets and if not, will not work ? -- Payam Chychi Network Engineer / Security Specialist On Thursday, November 28, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Mohammad Khalil wrote: Ok I have changed