On (2014-01-09 16:47 -0800), Han Hwei Woo wrote:
> I believe you're looking for next-header
>
> e.g. set from next-header tcp
I know this is known already to many, but I still feel it's important to keep
reminding. 'next-header tcp' is different thing than 'protocol tcp'.
'next-header' strictly
I believe you're looking for next-header
e.g. set from next-header tcp
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.3/topics/reference/general/firewall-filter-match-conditions-for-ipv6-traffic.html
Han Hwei Woo
h...@astutehosting.com
Astute Hosting Incorporated
T: 1.888.685.1661 (604.637.7939
* Mark Tinka
> Not to my knowledge, no (well, not in 2014 anyway). N:1 NAT
> is what makes sense.
FWIW, I've been working on a 1:1 (IPv4:IPv6) NAT solution that I believe
make a lot of sense in 2014 and beyond:
http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-anderson-siit-dc-00
http://www.ipspace.net/IPv6-O
On Thursday, January 09, 2014 11:32:07 AM Tore Anderson
wrote:
> FWIW, I've been working on a 1:1 (IPv4:IPv6) NAT solution
> that I believe make a lot of sense in 2014 and beyond:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-anderson-siit-dc-00
> http://www.ipspace.net/IPv6-Only_Data_Centers
Well, NA
On Thursday, January 09, 2014 10:31:34 AM Skeeve Stevens
wrote:
> Anyone got any deployment examples which would make this
> license worth while?
Not to my knowledge, no (well, not in 2014 anyway). N:1 NAT
is what makes sense.
Back in 200, an ISP I know of was offering 1:1 NAT on their
servic
You all rock.. Thanks.
But it seems like a VERY expensive license for just 1:1 NAT.
Anyone got any deployment examples which would make this license worth
while?
...Skeeve
*Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
ske...@eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com
Phone: 1300 239
6 matches
Mail list logo
