Re: [j-nsp] SRX PPPoE experience and scaling values.

I think that is not possible until now to use SRX as a BRAS element, only MX family. You could use MX5 with SM license for PPPoE users. Giuliano Cardozo Medalha Systems Engineer +55 (17) 3011-3811 +55 (17) 8112-5394 JUNIPER J-PARTNER ELITE giuli...@wztech.com.br http://www.wztech.com.br/

Re: [j-nsp] Best device to fit for a project

On Apr 1, 2014, at 2:37 AM, R S dim0...@hotmail.com wrote: For a project (70 branch offices and 2 Headquarters connected in an hubspoke topology with IPSEC over MPLS among branch and HQ) I’m looking for the best device which cover the following items: Branch: Single device At least

Re: [j-nsp] maximum BGP multipath ECMP supported on M7i or M10i routers?

I was referring to Juniper routing device. adam From: Yucong Sun [mailto:sunyuc...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 5:34 PM To: Vitkovský Adam Cc: kr...@smartcom.bg; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] maximum BGP multipath ECMP supported on M7i or M10i routers? Thanks,

[j-nsp] Help with MSTP in EX8208

Hello everyone, I would be grateful if somebody could help me with a problem related to MSTP in EX8208s running JunOS 12.3R5. My scenario is pretty simple: 2 EX8208s connected to each other by two links (the first one, ae2.0 consisting of one GE interface and the second one, ge-20/0/1.0).

[j-nsp] DWDM SFP+ Finisar

People, Does anyone has some experience using SFP+ (10G) DWDM Finisar (3 party optics) in JUNIPER products ? For 40Km or 80 Km ? Following: http://www.finisar.com/sites/default/files/pdf/FINISAR_WDM_Reference_Guide_Jun2008.pdf It works normally in MX240/480/960 or EX4550 ? Did you test it ?

Re: [j-nsp] Help with MSTP in EX8208

On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 03:36:51PM +0200, Octavio Alfageme wrote: I would like to have ae2.0 blocked in instance 1 and ge-20/0/1.0 blocked in instance 2. That's why I modify the cost of ae2.0 interface within instance 1 in both switches: Could you, please, help me to discover what I'm doing

Re: [j-nsp] DWDM SFP+ Finisar

On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 11:45:59AM -0300, Giuliano Medalha wrote: People, Does anyone has some experience using SFP+ (10G) DWDM Finisar (3 party optics) in JUNIPER products ? For 40Km or 80 Km ? Yes. Following:

Re: [j-nsp] Help with MSTP in EX8208

On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 01:29:46PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 03:36:51PM +0200, Octavio Alfageme wrote: I would like to have ae2.0 blocked in instance 1 and ge-20/0/1.0 blocked in instance 2. That's why I modify the cost of ae2.0 interface within instance 1 in both

[j-nsp] Are IRB interfaces still not functional under SRX?

Just double checking that IRB interfaces are not able to be used for routing under the SRX3k and 5k series? I have a customer asking to have cabinets uplink directly to the SRX3600 (no cluster), which means I'd have to use bridge domains. But, I don't think this will even work. Am I correct?

Re: [j-nsp] Are IRB interfaces still not functional under SRX?

For the record, I disagree with his method for many reasons, but if I'm correct this seals the coffin to to speak. Thanks, Morgan On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Morgan McLean wrx...@gmail.com wrote: Just double checking that IRB interfaces are not able to be used for routing under the

Re: [j-nsp] Are IRB interfaces still not functional under SRX?

You can create a VLAN and add interfaces to it. On Apr 2, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Morgan McLean wrx...@gmail.com wrote: Just double checking that IRB interfaces are not able to be used for routing under the SRX3k and 5k series? I have a customer asking to have cabinets uplink directly to the

Re: [j-nsp] Are IRB interfaces still not functional under SRX?

Not on a datacenter series SRX. Thanks, Morgan On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Will O'Brien will.obr...@noaa.gov wrote: You can create a VLAN and add interfaces to it. On Apr 2, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Morgan McLean wrx...@gmail.com wrote: Just double checking that IRB interfaces are not able

Re: [j-nsp] Are IRB interfaces still not functional under SRX?

I'm offline right now, but last time I checked, IRBs with bridge domains (SRX in transparent/L2 mode) were only used for management, no forwarding of transit traffic possible. /Per 2 apr 2014 kl. 21:46 skrev Morgan McLean wrx...@gmail.com: Just double checking that IRB interfaces are not

Re: [j-nsp] Are IRB interfaces still not functional under SRX?

On the branch at least - if you configure an irb interface, the box will fail commit check unless it is in transparent mode and it is only useable for management On 3 Apr 2014, at 7:05 am, Per Westerlund p...@westerlund.se wrote: I'm offline right now, but last time I checked, IRBs with

Re: [j-nsp] Help with MSTP in EX8208

Octavio, notice that the Role of the ports is MSTR not ROOT. Your two EX8200s are not in the same MSTI Region. Compare the configuration-name, revision-level, and VLAN-to-Instance assignments on the two switches; they are not the same. For more on the different MSTP Port Roles and their