Thanks Adam Ivan! I'll try this out shortly.
Best,
James
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 06:24:32AM +, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
To resolve the NHs you can do:
set routing-options rib-groups 0-to-6 import-rib inet.0
set routing-options rib-groups 0-to-6 import-rib inet6.0
set routing-options
On 18/May/15 14:11, Scott Granados wrote:
I’m not sure exactly what you’re looking for but the peer group system under
JunOS is fairly efficient. If you set your export and import policies per
group the bgp process will place these in a peer group and dynamically break
off slow members
Hello
I have three questions related to SRX self-generated traffic
1- How to force the SRX self-generated traffic to get out to internet through
certain link (suppose I have two internet connections)?
2- Is it possible to carry the self-generated traffic over a VPN tunnel
terminated on the SRX?
Hi Ivan, James,
To be honest I was improvising a bit with this one as we are using
bgp.l3vpn-inet6.0 (6VPE) so I thought that 6PE would use bgp.inet6.0 but Ivan
you’re right 6PE would be using inet6.0.
Alright so by default the inet6.0 would try to resolve NHs in inet6.3 right?
So it needs to
I’m not sure exactly what you’re looking for but the peer group system under
JunOS is fairly efficient. If you set your export and import policies per
group the bgp process will place these in a peer group and dynamically break
off slow members in to their own groups so that one slower peer
Hi Adam,
I am not sure if your solution will do the job. Do you have this in
production?
Table bgp.inet6.0 is a IPv6 table of routing-instance called 'bgp' or?
Routes from label-unicast inet6 family are put in inet6.0 table not in
bgp.inet6.0.
James will confirm that after he tests it. It
Hi Saku,
Saku Ytti [mailto:s...@ytti.fi]
Sent: 18 May 2015 12:50
On 18 May 2015 at 14:00, Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk
wrote:
Hey Adam,
Yes I'm thinking about BGP Dynamic Update Peer-Groups
- the improved BGP update message generation where the update-group
From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mark.ti...@seacom.mu]
Sent: 18 May 2015 13:23
On 18/May/15 14:11, Scott Granados wrote:
I'm not sure exactly what you're looking for but the peer group system
under JunOS is fairly efficient. If you set your export and import policies
per
group the bgp process
On May 18, 2015, at 8:08 AM, Julien Goodwin jgood...@studio442.com.au wrote:
On 18/05/15 21:49, Saku Ytti wrote:
The update-groups are created dynamically in JunOS as far as I know.
That is if you have BGP group where neighbors have unique export
policies, you will have multiple
On 18/05/15 21:49, Saku Ytti wrote:
The update-groups are created dynamically in JunOS as far as I know.
That is if you have BGP group where neighbors have unique export
policies, you will have multiple update-groups in configuration group.
But I guess if you have two neighbors with same
Hi,
Do you know if it is possible to clear show class-of-service fabric
statistics summary ?
thx
BR
Alberto
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
On 18 May 2015, at 11:21 pm, M Abdeljawad via juniper-nsp
juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net wrote:
Hello
I have three questions related to SRX self-generated traffic
1- How to force the SRX self-generated traffic to get out to internet through
certain link (suppose I have two internet
Hi James
James Jun
Sent: 16 May 2015 16:20
The problem however is that I'm using the P's also as route-reflectors for
distributing BGP throughout the network. So, I need the RR's to make
correct BGP best-path decisions, but they can't do that on 6PE routes without
having inet6.3 table to
Hi folks,
I'd like to ask if the 90's way of BGP generating updates per peer-group is a
cause for concern on a modern gear.
And if not then anyways am I the only one missing some flexibility in BGP peers
configuration in Junos?
It's really annoying that every time one needs to adjust something
On (2015-05-18 10:04 +), Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
Hey Adam,
I'd like to ask if the 90's way of BGP generating updates per peer-group is
a cause for concern on a modern gear.
And if not then anyways am I the only one missing some flexibility in BGP
peers configuration in Junos?
It's
Hey buddy,
Saku Ytti
Sent: 18 May 2015 11:12
On (2015-05-18 10:04 +), Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
Hey Adam,
I'd like to ask if the 90's way of BGP generating updates per peer-group
is
a cause for concern on a modern gear.
And if not then anyways am I the only one missing some
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:04:00AM +, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to ask if the 90's way of BGP generating updates per peer-group
is a cause for concern on a modern gear.
And if not then anyways am I the only one missing some flexibility in
BGP peers configuration in
On 18 May 2015 at 14:00, Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk wrote:
Hey Adam,
Yes I'm thinking about BGP Dynamic Update Peer-Groups
- the improved BGP update message generation where the update-group
memberships is calculated automatically/dynamically by the system based on
common
18 matches
Mail list logo
