Re: [j-nsp] jtree0 Memory full on MX480?

2015-07-23 Thread Chris Kawchuk
So the SCB itself is only responsible for the available bandwidth per slot but is not and will never be a memory limitation? Correct on all points. - CK. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

[j-nsp] Replacement HD/SSD for RE-850

2015-07-23 Thread Colin Baker
Hi, Recently had a hard drive fail on one of our RE-850 in an M7i. Does anyone have a known working (preferably SSD) replacement they can recommend? I seem to remember something on juniper.cluepon.net that certain models don't fit on the RE board all that well, but the site has been down

Re: [j-nsp] Replacement HD/SSD for RE-850

2015-07-23 Thread Tan Heng Chai
I've been using Transcend TS8GSSD25-S, there's a newer model TS8GPSD520 now. These work well; avoid the cheaper China/MLC ones, gave a lot of grief when we used them, random lockups and other odd problems. Yours Sincerely, Tan Heng Chai Chief Technical Officer - SG.GS http://www.sg.gs On

Re: [j-nsp] jtree0 Memory full on MX480?

2015-07-23 Thread Jeff Meyers
Thank's for clearification, that helps. So the SCB itself is only responsible for the available bandwidth per slot but is not and will never be a memory limitation? Best, Jeff Am 22.07.2015 um 23:51 schrieb Chris Kawchuk: On 23/07/2015, at 1:30 AM, Jeff Meyers jeff.mey...@gmx.net wrote:

Re: [j-nsp] jtree0 Memory full on MX480?

2015-07-23 Thread Mark Tinka
On 23/Jul/15 15:54, Jeff Meyers wrote: Thank's for clearification, that helps. So the SCB itself is only responsible for the available bandwidth per slot but is not and will never be a memory limitation? That's right. The SCB provides inter-slot bandwidth. It is not impacted by FIB memory.