A good place to look for feature support is
http://pathfinder.juniper.net/home/ where you can search by product type or
by feature (among other things).
A search for MACsec for switch to switch connections yeilds the following:
http://pathfinder.juniper.net/feature-explorer/feature-info.html?fKey=
My quick notes, since I just went through MACsec research recently:
MX: Only supported on MIC-3D-20GE-SFP-E
EX9200: Only supported on EX9200-40FE, and only on even numbered ports. Unclear
if a license is needed or not.
EX4200: Only supported on ports on optional EX-UM-2X4SFP-M module. Requires
Last I checked (a month or so ago?) there is only a single MIC (20x1gbps maybe)
that can do MacSec on the MX. I think the plan is for future MPCs to support it
with any enet MICs connected, but it's not there, yet.
I don't know for the full QFX line, but the EX4600s I have supposedly can do
lin
Hi James,
MACsec isn't done on the MS-MPC to my knowledge it's normally only L3
services. It looks like MACsec is supported but you would have to check for
this feature support per line card.
Have a look here:
http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos15.1/topics/concept/macsec-overview-mx-
Hi Mike
Does ms-mpc support l2 encryption?
Indeed I was thinking mac-sec at 40/100gbs...
Cheers
James
Il 14/Dic/2015 23:47, "Michael Gehrmann" ha
scritto:
> Hi James,
>
> A Juniper MX, MS-MPC is licensable up to 100Gbps so add the MS-MPC +
> License x 2 for cost.
>
> Cheers
> Mike
>
> On 15 Dec
Hi James,
A Juniper MX, MS-MPC is licensable up to 100Gbps so add the MS-MPC +
License x 2 for cost.
Cheers
Mike
On 15 December 2015 at 09:31, james list wrote:
> Hi Mike
> Beside the cost, are those speed supported by any juniper/arista/what else
> device?
>
> Cheers
> James
> Il 14/Dic/2015
Hi Mike
Beside the cost, are those speed supported by any juniper/arista/what else
device?
Cheers
James
Il 14/Dic/2015 23:24, "Michael Gehrmann" ha
scritto:
> For those speeds you are better off getting the traffic encrypted by the
> end hosts/servers. Pushing encryption to the network will be m
For those speeds you are better off getting the traffic encrypted by the end
hosts/servers. Pushing encryption to the network will be more expensive.
Mike
> On 15 Dec 2015, at 02:15, james list wrote:
>
> Dear experts,
>
> a customer of mine is asking for LAN encryption at 40Gbs (with possib
Dear experts,
a customer of mine is asking for LAN encryption at 40Gbs (with possibility
to increase at 100Gbs) for DC interconnection (30 km distance).
I’m wondering if QFX is the right device or any other recommendation with
Juniper ?
I’m also having a look to Arista… any experience also wi
On 11/12/15 17:16, Chuck Anderson wrote:
For those of us who wish to/need to use commercial NMS software, are
there any that support NETCONF? And NETCONF isn't the answer yet
anyway to cross-vendor standardization, at least not until standard
YANG models are developed. At least Q-BRIDGE-MIB ex
10 matches
Mail list logo