Why not set a vlan-id at the bridge domain level? That will take care of
normalising the VLAN IDs.
Josh
On Friday, 3 June 2016, Matthew Crocker wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I’m trying to lab out the following scenario. Running into a couple
> snags, hoping someone can point me to the right documenta
Hello,
I’m trying to lab out the following scenario. Running into a couple snags,
hoping someone can point me to the right documentation.
I have 17 SRX300s connected to a WAN that I want to link together into the
same virtual-switch/bridge/VPLS/??? in my MX240. The SRXs will enter the
MX
Once upon a time, Jesper Skriver said:
> The flip side is that all pointers are twice the size, in an application like
> rpd I'd expect most of the memory usage to be pointers, so we can expect ~2x
> the memory usage. That coupled with memory access typically being the
> bottleneck makes it les
> On 01 Jun 2016, at 21:29, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
> The other benefit would be the ability for rpd to make use of more CPU
> registers and to be faster. On average, one could expect a 20% speedup
> when recompiling for x86-64. I have absolutely no idea if such number
> would apply to rpd.
The
Le 02/06/2016 à 00:02, Olivier Benghozi a écrit :
This is not completely contradictory with the Juniper doc ; as usual with the
Juniper doc written with feet, you have to read between the lines:
-> Written in the doc: "Tip: You need not restart the routing protocol process (rpd)
to use the 6
5 matches
Mail list logo
