Re: [j-nsp] MX104 capabilities question

On 22 Jun 2016 13:51, "Saku Ytti" wrote: > > On 22 June 2016 at 10:41, joel jaeggli wrote: > >>> Can you expand on what you mean by the following quote: "I think they are > >>> fundamentally able to produce less buggy code than > >>> JNPR or CSCO. > > > > yeah if

[j-nsp] default uRPF strict on irb interface accepts DHCP?

Hi, I’m trying to understand some counterintuitive behaviour I’m seeing with uRPF strict and DHCP on a EX9200/14.2R4.9 According to the documentation[1], uRPF will not, by default, permit DHCP or BOOTP, however the actual behaviour seems to be inconsistent with the documentation: set