uRPF check doesn't work since customer can just advertise his routes over
backup link.
I had some hopes for conditional bgp advertisement and SCU/DCU but I don't
think it works not to mention it's like trying to kill a bee with a hammer.
What about MC-LAG between two routers and just setting one l
It’s a default setting … has to be in the configuration but suggest setting it
to the appropriate option … in my case it’s typically enhanced-ip but that
varies depending on your needs
http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos15.1/topics/concept/network-services-mode-overview.html
My MX104's for my CGNat project just arrived and we've staged them in the
network. I was turning them up and am seeing a certain command that I don't
recall typing.. What is this for, and why do I need it ?
agould@blcn-h-104> show configuration | display set | grep "chassis net"
set chassis ne
On 13/Jul/16 22:23, Clinton Work wrote:
> On the primary BGP session I would set Local-pref 150 and send MED 100
> for example.
> On the backup BGP session, set local-pref 100 and send MED 150.
>
> The local-pref will set the preferred route in your network to use the
> primary BGP session.
On the primary BGP session I would set Local-pref 150 and send MED 100
for example.
On the backup BGP session, set local-pref 100 and send MED 150.
The local-pref will set the preferred route in your network to use the
primary BGP session. The MED should influence the customer to use the
pr
On 13.07.2016 10:36, Cydon Satyr wrote:
Any other suggestions maybe?
What about uRPF strict mode on the customer-facing interfaces? This will
prevent the customer from sending traffic on the "backup" interface as
long as the primary circuit is up and preferred on your end.
That being said
On 13/Jul/16 10:44, Cydon Satyr wrote:
> I agree with you 100%. Active/Active and splitting policer values.
Well, splitting the bandwidth equally has the side-effect of leaving the
customer at half-mast when one link fails. So that is not useful.
You'd have to fix the issue "commercially", not
I agree with you 100%. Active/Active and splitting policer values.
However, this doesn't help my case ;)
Thanks
Regards
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 13/Jul/16 10:36, Cydon Satyr wrote:
>
> What would be the optimal way to deal with following scenario.
>
> The c
On 13/Jul/16 10:36, Cydon Satyr wrote:
> What would be the optimal way to deal with following scenario.
>
> The customer of ours has a primary bgp connection over primary link on one
> router, and a backup bgp connection (up) on backup link on our other
> router. The customer may or may not (usu
What would be the optimal way to deal with following scenario.
The customer of ours has a primary bgp connection over primary link on one
router, and a backup bgp connection (up) on backup link on our other
router. The customer may or may not (usually not) terminate both
primary/backup links on th
10 matches
Mail list logo