Re: [j-nsp] Going Juniper

Hi, On 10/04/2018 11:37 PM, mike+j...@willitsonline.com wrote: I know it can be set up and run like a champ and do some (undefined) number of gigabits without issue. What concerns me is that there are performance limitations in these software only platforms based on your processor/bus/card

Re: [j-nsp] Going Juniper

FSVO tens Gbps and easily. I think INTC is quoting DPDK for hundreds of Gbps for latest XEONs. But everything depends on what you're actually doing, as it's run-to-completion it has highly variant pps performance depending on what is being done. Do you have filters? How large FIB? uRPF? 10Gbps

Re: [j-nsp] Going Juniper

There are x86 based routing platforms doing many tens of Gbps easily in software. Things like vpp.io, DPDK, and others are driving things like FRR, Cumulus, and now TNSR drastically forward. On Tue, Apr 10, 2018, 10:40 AM wrote: > On 04/09/2018 08:07 PM, Chris via

Re: [j-nsp] Going Juniper

On 04/09/2018 08:07 PM, Chris via juniper-nsp wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/04/2018 9:45 AM, mike+j...@willitsonline.com wrote: >> I see there is a terrific amount of used mx104 and mx240 out there >> and the specs all seem great. What I'm looking to do is have 2x 10g >> feeds, route bgp, do flow

Re: [j-nsp] Going Juniper

Mike, For 20K you can get a new MX204 (not to be confused with MX240). However, I don't think the MX204 support CGNAT if needed, but I could be wrong. But I wouldn't touch a MX80 or MX104 if buying new. On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 8:45 PM, wrote: > Greetings, > > I

Re: [j-nsp] Going Juniper

Hi, On 10/04/2018 11:07 AM, Chris via juniper-nsp wrote: I also have some vMX's deployed (they are running on top of Dell R740's with 3 x Intel X710 cards to give 12 x 10G interfaces). The painful part on getting the vMX to work was the host setup with KVM - the documents are severly lacking

Re: [j-nsp] Going Juniper

I have found the licensing costs on the MX104 to be pretty ridiculous. I can buy a brand new MX204 with plenty of 10Gbps interfaces for cheaper than it would be up upgrade the "base" MX104 (MX104-MX5 bundle) to enable the four of the built-in 10Gbps interfaces and additional chassis throughput.

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 and copper SFP?

Many thanks Graham. I see this works on 15.1F6 at least, and might in fact prove useful for us. Br, Niall From: Graham Brown [mailto:juniper-...@grahambrown.info] Sent: 09 April 2018 10:14 To: Niall Donaghy Cc: Saku Ytti ; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] Going Juniper

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:07:06AM +0800, Chris via juniper-nsp wrote: > to need their hardware, the vMX suites my needs just fine. Juniper does > provide a (limited) demo of the vMX, happy to send you the install guide I > wrote up for getting it working on KVM with CentOS 7.4 (Ubuntu is also >

[j-nsp] VXLAN, BGP EVPN, remote VTEP

Hey! I am noticing an odd behaviour when using BGP EVPN on a vQFX: it assumes that all VTEP have all the local VNIs. For example, on the local system, I have VNI 654, 655 and 656. However, on the remote VTEP, I have only 654 and 655. However, the local system still assumes VNI 656 should be