Re: [j-nsp] prsearch missing in inaction

2019-05-08 Thread Nathan Ward
> On 9/05/2019, at 10:44 AM, Richard McGovern wrote: > > Contacted someone internally and yes this is being worked on. The time > period is "end of Q2, hopefully sooner". Can you shed any light on what on earth is going on, and why? It seems crazy that a company would disable this sort of th

Re: [j-nsp] prsearch missing in inaction

2019-05-08 Thread Richard McGovern via juniper-nsp
Contacted someone internally and yes this is being worked on. The time period is "end of Q2, hopefully sooner". In the meantime, if you need comparison between 2 releases of same major release, then TAC should be able to generate this for you via internal PR DIFF tool. This only works between

[j-nsp] ICMP from SRX accross policy vpn tunnel

2019-05-08 Thread Lenny Shovsky
Wondering how to get ping to work directly from SRX across ipsec policy tunnels. Have no issues dong it with route based tunnels, simply using lo0 with tunneled subnet address and default-address-selection option, but can't make it work with policy tunnels. Long term goal is to get vpn-monitor op

Re: [j-nsp] prsearch missing in inaction

2019-05-08 Thread Nathan Ward
> On 8/05/2019, at 7:05 PM, Rob Foehl wrote: > > On Tue, 7 May 2019, Nathan Ward wrote: > >> Is it actually coming back? Hard to believe the “technical issue” given how >> long it’s been, seems like a pretty big systemic issue rather than a >> technical one. “Actively worked on” seems pretty

Re: [j-nsp] prsearch missing in inaction

2019-05-08 Thread Rob Foehl
On Tue, 7 May 2019, Nathan Ward wrote: Is it actually coming back? Hard to believe the “technical issue” given how long it’s been, seems like a pretty big systemic issue rather than a technical one. “Actively worked on” seems pretty inactive, to me. Maybe it runs on Space, and they're just w