Hi Jeff,
What type of DPC card you're using? As per your initial email I wouldn't
expect PIC 4 on DPC card related to gr-5/4/0 interface to be present as
PICs can take numbers between 0 and 3.
What is your network-services mode (show chassis network-services)?
Is DPC card up (show chassis fpc)?
Hi Jim,
thanks for the quick reply! However, unfortunately that did not do the
job and the interface still doesn't show up, neither with 1g nor 10g for
the bandwidth:
# show chassis fpc 0
pic 0 {
tunnel-services {
bandwidth 10g;
}
}
# show interfaces gr-0/0/0
unit 0 {
Thanks very much for the kind reply.
My customer is evaluating the options for serving its customers and
evaluating the vendors to check what best suits him.
I am trying to convince him with Juniper MX10 but he needs some scale
values :)
Thanks again mate.
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 23:48, Saku Ytti
Hey Mohammad,
I don't think you'll find anything concrete. I don't think there will
be specific hard limit. And answer would require more dimensions.
It's different to have 10k pseudowires to 1 remote PE than to have 1
pseudowire to 10k different remote PE. LDP/BGP affects the answer.
It would
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 23:10, wrote:
> All this time watching the thread I'm thinking if it's just coincidence that
> in some cases no matter how good the hash value is the available buckets
> skew the balancing. (and I guess that's why three are knobs to shift the
> hash around.
Obviously
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 22:17, Thomas Bellman wrote:
> I don't think anyone has said that any product use the ethernet
> packet's CRC for LAG/ECMP hashing. Just that they might reuse
> the CRC circuitry in the NPU/ASIC for calculating this hash, but
> based on different inputs.
Exactly and even
> James Bensley
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 9:52 AM
>
> In the worst case scenario (1), with 4 bytes of CRC output to represent an
> entire frame there is a large amount of hash collisions; Min size frame; 6
byte
> SRC, 6 byte DST, 2 byte EType, 46 byte payload == 2^480 possible Ethernet
>
On 2019-08-29 17:31 +0200, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> You are very correct. I was very highly surprised to read Saku mentioning
> use of CRC for hashing but then quick google revealed this link:
>
>
Greetings all.
Am trying to find how many pseduwires are supported on MX10 with no luck.
Any ideas?
Appreciated.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Hi Eldon,
You are very correct. I was very highly surprised to read Saku mentioning
use of CRC for hashing but then quick google revealed this link:
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/reference/configuration-statement/hash-parameters-edit-forwarding-options.html
Looks
Reduced scale is currently honor based. Please note that in the future,
Juniper is very likely to put in SW hooks to make licenses actually active, and
no longer honor based. This is likely to be across the whole product portfolio.
Rich
Richard McGovern
Sr Sales Engineer, Juniper Networks
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:52 AM James Bensley
wrote:
> Different parameters may or may not change the diffusion density, but
> they may increase the range of results, i.e. perfect diffusion over
> 2^2 outcomes vs. perfect diffusion over 2^6 outcomes.
>
> Also, ASR9Ks use a CRC32 on Typhoon cards
Thank you for all answers!
Is there any licenses required for MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP, or is the "reduced
scale L3" only a gentlemen agreement?
Johan
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 5:27 PM Tobias Heister
wrote:
> On 28.08.2019 17:10, Brian Johnson wrote:
> > Do you know if you have the enhanced
On DPCs you need to set the bandwidth setting.
set chassis fpc pic tunnel-services bandwidth <10g - 100g>
Be advised that this will burn a 10 gig port for each 10 gigs you assign to
tunnel-services.
Regard,
Clay Haynes
Sent from my iPhone
> On 29 Aug 2019, at 10:50, Jeff Meyers wrote:
>
Hi list,
I'm trying to setup a GRE tunnel interface on a MX480 with DPCE
linecards. I want to use xe-5/4/0 and have therefore configured this
interface under 'edit chassis' for tunnel-services. The interface
vanishes as expected. I have then configured the interface gr-5/4/0 with
unit 0 but is
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 11:52, James Bensley
wrote:
> Hmm, interesting, but has anyone confirmed to you these devices to use
> a CRC32 for the hashing are you trying to reverse engineer this? Is
> there any reason why this couldn't just be a dodgy Juniper proprietary
> hash algo? I'm just playing
16 matches
Mail list logo
