Hi Paul,
Thank You very much for the clarification. I will have only one ASBR. As for
redundancy I'll go with a single 1400 unit and add a second in the future.
Still, a single SRX1400 will be probably more stable then a single J6350.
On the side note - does Juniper plan to have a replacement
>
> Good, you cannot run UTM on the data center SRX at the moment, branch only.
>
> On Apr 27, 2013, at 12:55 PM, James Howlett wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for the heads-up
>
> > Srx's have replication issues with large routing environments. Duplicatin
veat in mind
> when you want clustered fail over.
>
I have a budget only for one 1400 at the moment.
I don't plan to run UTM on it as well.
Just few bgp sessions, firewall and some DDoS screening.
Regards,
jim
> Hope this helps,
> -Tim Eberhard
>
>
> On A
Hello,
I have a network build on J4350 and SRX240 and i need to upgrade. I was
thinking about switching two devices for SRX1400.
My network has 2 full bgp feeds and some peerings. We use about 150-200Mbps
average. Will SRX1400 be a good choice then?
Best regards,
jim
Hello,
>
> Definitely SCREENs, as other folks have said.
>
> However, in the corner case where you're getting traffic for a
> particular service or destination IP that isn't in use (maybe not in
> this instance), a quick way of protecting the traffic from hitting the
> flow module is to use a fi
niper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Have a look at the screen options on both kits, we can apply basic DDoS
protection there and limit stuff like max connections over a short period etc
On 11 April 2013 09:57, James Howlett wrote:
Hello,
I have a small network with J6350 as a border router (BGP) an
Hello,
I have a small network with J6350 as a border router (BGP) and two SRX240H in a
cluster.
Since few days my network is a victim of DDoS attacks. Majority of them are
high pps count attacks.
Are there any methods to protect my network against such attacks. My J-series
can handle quite a lo
7 matches
Mail list logo
