[j-nsp] How useful is Juniper storm control?

2013-05-14 Thread James S. Smith
I'm looking for people's experience with storm control on Juniper switches. We have a pair of EX4500 switches and I notice that storm control kicks in a lot. I'm concerned that it might be stopping legitimate broadcast and multicast traffic. Before we put in these Juniper switches into the ne

Re: [j-nsp] Inserting security policies on SRX

2013-05-02 Thread James S. Smith
Is something funny going on with the mailing list? I sent this original email 2 years ago. Also saw a bunch of other emails get sent out that people had sent from 2009 and 2010 From: Michael Loftis [mailto:mlof...@wgops.com] Sent: May-01-13 10:28 AM To: James S. Smith Cc: juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Inserting security policies on SRX

2013-05-01 Thread James S. Smith
Never mind, answered my own question. Didn't realize you have to define the policy first and let it be added to the bottom of the list, and then use the insert statement to move it. James S. Smith Network Architect WIND Mobile 207 Queen's Quay West, Suite 710 Toronto, ON M5J 1A7

[j-nsp] Inserting security policies on SRX

2013-05-01 Thread James S. Smith
zone. When trying to insert a new policy the SRX complains the policy does not exist. jsmith@fw01# insert security policies from-zone it_staff to-zone untrust policy it_staff-untrust-windows-rdp before policy it_staff-untrust-default error: statement 'it_staff-untrust-windows-rdp' not f

Re: [j-nsp] SRX3600 weirdness

2013-04-27 Thread James S. Smith
I’ve been able to make some more sense of the problem.  After clarifying a few things with the database admins, the issue isn’t sending mail.  It’s some ticketing system that receives email approves, so it’s constantly checking an Exchange mailbox.  That’s where the IMAP traffic comes in. After

Re: [j-nsp] SRX3600 weirdness

2013-04-23 Thread James S. Smith
I found that a bit strange myself, but we log all traffic flows through the firewall and the only communication going on was on port 993. -Original Message- From: Andrew Miehs [mailto:and...@2sheds.de] Sent: April-23-13 7:40 PM To: James S. Smith Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject

[j-nsp] SRX3600 weirdness

2013-04-23 Thread James S. Smith
Just in the process of finishing a project of migrating subnets behind an SRX3600, and we've run into some odd behavior. We have a database subnet outside the firewall, and an exchange server subnet behind the firewall. A database server uses IMAP4 over SSL (TCP 993) to send emails to Exchan

Re: [j-nsp] EX Switch Question

2013-01-10 Thread James S. Smith
Just avoid the 4500 if you need anything less than 1G copper. The ports on the 4500 won't negotiate to 10 or 100. I was told by the sales engineer that this switch is a "top of rack" switch so it doesn't support anything less than 1G. I found that funny since I have a whole rack of Avaya gear

Re: [j-nsp] Weird SRX flow timeout issue

2012-11-12 Thread James S. Smith
Might not be an issue, but have you turned off the ALG for SQL? We've found that most of the Juniper ALGs cause a lot of problems in general and it's better to just turn them off, especially for long running queries. You'll never see anything in the logs, even if it's the cause of your problem

Re: [j-nsp] SRX3600 and NAT

2012-04-26 Thread James S. Smith
routers. James S. Smith Network and Security Architect WIND Mobile 207 Queen's Quay West, Suite 710 Toronto, ON M5J 1A7 Email: jsm...@windmobile.ca Direct: 416-640-9792 Fax: 416-987-1203 www.windmobile.ca www.twitter.com/WINDmobile www.facebook.com/WINDmobile THAT'S THE POW

Re: [j-nsp] SRX3600 and NAT

2012-04-26 Thread James S. Smith
How many SPU cards do you have in the box? I'd be interested to know other people's experiences with the application inpsection for various databases. I usually turn the ALG for the off because the DBAs complain that long queries are get terminated, even after tweeking the timeouts. - O

Re: [j-nsp] Off-topic: terminal concentrators

2011-06-23 Thread James S. Smith
We use a Cisco 2811. It's 1U, uses the same async NMs and WICs as the 3640s, and will handle 32 serial ports (might actually be more). James S. Smith, Network and Security Architect, Juniper Networks Certified Associate WIND Mobile 207 Queen's Quay West, Suite 710 Toronto, ON M5J

Re: [j-nsp] Alarm for non-existant PEM

2011-06-20 Thread James S. Smith
sold us this SRX. Since I've been dealing with Juniper directly and doing my own research I haven't had any gotchas. James S. Smith, Network and Security Architect, Juniper Networks Certified Associate WIND Mobile 207 Queen's Quay West, Suite 710 Toronto, ON M5J 1A7 Email:

[j-nsp] Alarm for non-existant PEM

2011-06-20 Thread James S. Smith
un 19 01:31:02 PIC (fpc 14 pic 0) message operation: delete. ifd count 0, flags 0 in mesg Jun 19 01:31:02 pic_handle_message_idl: PIC fpc 14 pic 0 got deleted Jun 19 01:31:02 Clearing scc context Jun 19 01:31:05 send: red alarm clear, device PEM 0, reason PEM 0 Not OK James S. Smith, Network

Re: [j-nsp] SRX policy action to inject a route in a table??

2011-03-17 Thread James S. Smith
Have you looked into an inline IPS in front of the SRX to just block misbehaving host? I've had a lot of success with this. - Original Message - From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net To: juniper-nsp Sent: Thu Mar 17 18:04:36 2011 Subject: [j-nsp] SRX policy action to inject a rou

[j-nsp] VPN between SRX with dynamic IP address to Cisco ASA

2011-03-17 Thread James S. Smith
I'm having a bit of trouble with this configuration: I have an SRX 240 (JunOS 10.0R3.10) that is connected to the Internet with a CX-111. The CX-111 has a 3G stick for its Internet. The SRX receives a DHCP address on ge-0/0/0.0 and can reach the Internet without a problem. I'd now like to s

Re: [j-nsp] Qfabric

2011-02-24 Thread James S. Smith
I'm have the same question. From the sounds of it, we could replace our SAN with this? I know that wouLd be a hard sell to the SAN guys. - Original Message - From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net To: Derick Winkworth Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thu Feb 24 17:32:39 2011

Re: [j-nsp] OSPF IMPORT POLICIES

2010-12-02 Thread James S. Smith
Just thinking about hacks, one way that might work would be to setup static routes on the devices where you don't want these routes. For example: set routing-options static route 192.168.123.0/24 reject Since this is a static it will be preferred over the OSPF routes. -Original Message--

Re: [j-nsp] OSPF IMPORT POLICIES

2010-12-01 Thread James S. Smith
I don't see this as being possible. The whole point of OSPF is to provide consistent routing data across all routers in the area. If Juniper allowed filtering of internal routes being imported then that model could be broken. Everything I've read say JunOS can't filter internal routes from be