Re: [j-nsp] Flex licensing on MPC10

Hi Richard, Thanks for the explanation. But, for example, suppose I have an ADVANCED license for 5 years. After 5 years, I do not remember or see the alarms from the equipment indicating that it will be out of license. Will all features stop working? Regards, Javier. El mié., 8 abr. 2020 a las

[j-nsp] ifOutDiscards doesn't increase in LAG interfaces

Hi all, I'm trying to understand why the OID field ifOutDiscards (in the MIB) does not increase in the LAG interfaces (MX routers). I see that discards grow in "show interfaces aeX extensive" but do not appear in the OID field. Does anyone know where the problem might be? Thank you, Regards, Jav

Re: [j-nsp] MX104 limitation

Hi, As Nitzan suggested, I deactivated the inline jflow and the traffic has increased. Now I ask, what is the real forwarding capacity of this box? 40G in + 40G out? (now it didn't reach 40G in total) Javier. 2017-03-20 12:15 GMT-03:00 Javier Rodriguez : > Nitzan, thank you very mu

Re: [j-nsp] MX104 limitation

tion around 40Gbps when running MX80 with RE based jflow > (inline works good ) we didnt got good explanation why it limit the traffic > so try to disable some features and see if it help > > Nitzan > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Javier Rodriguez < > rodriguezsot...@gm

Re: [j-nsp] MX104 limitation

only 31Gbps total, without having any actual data, my best > > guess is that you're running through QX. Only quick reason I can come > > up for HW to limit on so modest traffic levels. > > > > On 20 March 2017 at 02:25, Javier Rodriguez > wrote: > >> Soku, &g

Re: [j-nsp] MX104 limitation

U counters might be interesting to see. > > If you use QX chip, 62Gbps would be really good, QX chip is not > dimensioned for line rate _unidir_ (i.e. can't do even 40Gbps). If you > don't know if you're using QX or not, just deactive whole > class-of-service and schedue

Re: [j-nsp] MX104 limitation

ut). > > On 19 March 2017 at 09:12, Javier Rodriguez > wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I need a bit of your knowledge. > > I have a MX104 as PE router with 4 LAGs. > > One LAG facing to P router on FPC2 (fixed ports). The other LAGs > > distributed in FPC0

[j-nsp] MX104 limitation

Hi everyone, I need a bit of your knowledge. I have a MX104 as PE router with 4 LAGs. One LAG facing to P router on FPC2 (fixed ports). The other LAGs distributed in FPC0 and FPC1. The problem is that traffic is being limited when reach 28G out/ 4G in (31Gbps total). I changed one interface (10G)

Re: [j-nsp] Full routes on MX5

s 2 Million routes, so is that 4 full BGP > tables/upstream providers? > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Eduardo Schoedler > wrote: > >> 2016-04-26 13:15 GMT-03:00 Javier Rodriguez : >> > Hi, >> > >> > How much memory is left available with one full

Re: [j-nsp] Full routes on MX5

Hi, How much memory is left available with one full table on a MX80? I have a problem with routes at the process installation into the FIB (KRT) and they remain pending for a long time. Do you know if this issue is related to memory? How can i solve it?. Javier Rodríguez. 2016-04-26 10:36 GMT-