It is basically a way to allow two routing tables to share some or all
routes without using up extra memory by actually overlapping them and
copying those routes into each table that needs them.
[j-nsp] rib group
David water
to:
juniper-nsp
04/27/10 12:08 AM
Sent by:
No offense but that example seems a bit hokey to me. How many quad CCIE's
are there in the world now 12? Also, how many of them update route
filters for a living? They are usually pretty high up (deserving or no).
In Scott's case he was just nominated as everyone's favorite routing
As with most other "dirty" address ranges these will inevitably be used for something. It's just a fact of life as IPv4 space becomes more and more scarce. For example APNIC has begun assigning addresses in the previously reserved and often hijacked 1.0/8
This is more a design question than configuration. It depends on if you
need routes reflected to this reflector or if it will receive all the
necessary routes via it's normal peerings. It sounds like you don't need
the second RR to be a client of the first, but again that depends on your
Have you tried google? :)
Here's a link with pictures.
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/reference/specifications/ac-power-ex8200-series-cord.html
Re: [j-nsp] Industrial Socket for EX8208??
Fahad Khan
to:
Keegan.Holley
05/02/10 02:32 PM
Cc:
juniper
Both switches depend on the type of power supply ordered and the country
you install it in. For example you can have a 6500 with power supplies
that use the normal sockets. A fully populated 6509 will consume most of
the power on a 220/208V AC circuit so it is easier to order it with the
I think we went with the EX4200's because they are stackable and support
dual power and we didn't need an abundance of 10G. Personally I like Junos
as compared to the other CLI's the policy chains and configure groups make
configuration and automating said configuration much easier, but YMMV.
I think it depends on the application. For example the Juniper still has
higher port density via support for more multiport SONET interfaces. Also,
I could be wrong but I don't believe the ASR 1002 supports 10G. I think
the ASR1002 is made for an application that people usually choose cisco
Maybe it's an effort at some sort of VAR relationship? I'm sure we'd all
buy more routers if they came with a large fry and some sort of toy.
From:
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net
To:
juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date:
10/29/2009 03:02 PM
Subject:
[j-nsp] death by branding
Sent by:
9 matches
Mail list logo
