was
13.1 I beleive at the time for our 4550.
Thank you,
*Levi Pederson*
Mankato Networks LLC
cell | 612.481.0769
work | 612.787.7392
levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Tony Hawke <tyn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Unfortunately, it looks l
air amount of unlisted ports to still
maintain access.
Does anyone remember if this is possible. Still sorting through
documentation to validate my memory.
Thank you,
*Levi Pederson*
Mankato Networks LLC
cell | 612.481.0769
work | 612.787.7392
levipeder...@mankatone
the
serial numbers.
Thank you,
*Levi Pederson*
Mankato Networks LLC
cell | 612.481.0769
work | 612.787.7392
levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Scott Granados sc...@granados-llc.net
wrote:
Hi Ross, I had tried this but still no link. I believe I have
serial-number ##1
set virtual-chassis member 1 role routing-engine
set virtual-chassis member 1 serial-number ##2
2. Do you have set virtual-chassis no-split-detection recommended for
only 2 member VC's
*Levi Pederson*
Mankato Networks LLC
cell | 612.481.0769
work | 612.787.7392
levipeder
that
one mistake.
Thank you all to those who provided their two cents and more.
Thank you,
*Levi Pederson*
Mankato Networks LLC
cell | 612.481.0769
work | 612.787.7392
levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Chris Kawchuk juniperd...@gmail.com
wrote:
Post relevant
there is not a Layer 2 issue but something more
enigmatic.
Currently reading up on RSVP priority/preference but that seems like taking
a 2Ton Electromagnetic Sentient WreckingBall to hammer in a nail.
Thank you,
*Levi Pederson*
Mankato Networks LLC
cell | 612.481.0769
work | 612.787.7392
Ben,
Thank you for the thought out response.
I'll dive into the L2 side.
Thank you,
*Levi Pederson*
Mankato Networks LLC
cell | 612.481.0769
work | 612.787.7392
levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Ben Dale bd...@comlinx.com.au wrote:
Hi Levi,
On 17 Jul
(is my assumption). If one of my intervening links goes own I
would like to correct it and then move the break to the specified point.
But the RSVP documentation is rather...limited to only LSPs if I am reading
it correctly.
Any and all assistance would be much appreciated.
Thank you
*Levi
All,
Thank you all for your help! It's putting me on the right track!
One thing to note since I'm using EX4550's I do not have Flexible Ethernet
Services Only vlan-ccc and ethernet-ccc
Thank you all for your help!
*Levi Pederson*
Mankato Networks LLC
cell | 612.481.0769
work | 612.787.7392
. But some documents
state LoopBack.
Thank you,
*Levi Pederson*
Mankato Networks LLC
cell | 612.481.0769
work | 612.787.7392
levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo
a few.
Thank you,
*Levi Pederson*
Mankato Networks LLC
cell | 612.481.0769
work | 612.787.7392
levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com
wrote:
What are the limitations of buying a used Juniper MX router? I assume there
will be no JTAC
Peter,
Would an aggregate interface assist in this? If It can be done in your
logical scheme, the aggregate interface would provide a simple way to apply
the entire X bandwidth no matter the pipes up.
Thank you,
*Levi Pederson*
Mankato Networks LLC
cell | 612.481.0769
work | 612.787.7392
M,
I've landed a VPN on an SRX 240 cluster but I had to update the config to a
version of 12+ to use the LoopBack as a VPN end-point. believe it was 12.44
but I would check the information sheets on the OS versions. Though I am
unsure of the support on the Virtual Side
Thank you,
*Levi
if anyone has attempted this and has any pointers.
Thank you,
*Levi Pederson*
Mankato Networks LLC
cell | 612.481.0769
work | 612.787.7392
levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
-cable?
Thank you,
*Levi Pederson*
Mankato Networks LLC
cell | 612.481.0769
work | 612.787.7392
levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Giuliano (WZTECH) giuli...@wztech.com.br
wrote:
We have a situation here and we find a way ... We connect 2 interfaces in
a optical
{
- seconds 30;
- }
- option-refresh-rate {
- seconds 30;
- }
- ipv4-template;
- }
- }
- }
- }
Edited for Anonymity.
Thank you,
.
*Levi Pederson*
Mankato Networks LLC
cell | 612.481.0769
All,
Amazing, prompt and detailed responses. I'll get to work on these right
away.
Thank you,
*Levi Pederson*
Mankato Networks LLC
cell | 612.481.0769
work | 612.787.7392
levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Scott Granados sc...@granados-llc.net
wrote:
Hi
for version9
error: configuration check-out failed: (statements constraint check failed)
Any help or direction pointing would be helpful.
Thank you,
*Levi Pederson*
Mankato Networks LLC
cell | 612.481.0769
work | 612.787.7392
levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net
of
the family bridge and that is being rejected as there is an inet
statement (on another Logical interface) in existence.
Thank you,
*Levi Pederson*
Mankato Networks LLC
cell | 612.481.0769
work | 612.787.7392
levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net
___
juniper
while the other is still in production. I'm looking at the hierarchy of
the commands required seem to overlap the current configuration. Has
anyone tried this before?
Thank you,
*Levi Pederson*
Mankato Networks LLC
cell | 612.481.0769
work | 612.787.7392
levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net
the
configurations for perusal as they need to be secured. First question
would be, does anything instantly pop out to anyone? I'll have the configs
loaded as soon as I can.
Thank you,
*Levi Pederson*
Mankato Networks LLC
cell | 612.481.0769
work | 612.787.7392
levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net
21 matches
Mail list logo